Back

From divergence to contact: demographic history and genomic context shape introgression across independent damselfly hybrid zones

Stand-Perez, M.; Arce Valdes, L. R.; Ordaz-Morales, J. E.; Swaegers, J.; Chavez-Rios, J. R.; Gutierrez-Rodriguez, C.; Ibarra-Laclette, E.; Hansson, B.; Baena-Diaz, F.; Sanchez-Guillen, R. A.

2026-04-10 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.09.717498 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Hybridisation outcomes often vary across space and time, yet the relative roles of demographic history and genomic architecture in shaping introgression remain unclear. Here, we investigate three replicated hybrid zones between the damselflies Ischnura elegans and Ischnura graellsii across Spain to test whether genomic introgression patterns are repeatable across independently formed zones. Using genome-wide data, we combined demographic modelling, genomic cline, and functional annotation of introgressed loci. Demographic inference supported three independent secondary contact events of different ages: The South-east zone forming first ([~]207 years ago), followed by the North-west ([~]73.5 years) and North-central ([~]33 years) hybrid zones. Despite similar cline steepness across autosomes, asymmetric gene flow from I. graellsii into I. elegans was observed, with a low overlap of introgressed loci between zones. These loci were mainly associated with broad regulatory and transport-related functions in both hybrid zones, indicating repeatability at the level of gene function rather than gene identity. In contrast, the X chromosome showed steeper clines, suggesting strong intrinsic genomic constraints. Together, demographic history explains geographic heterogeneity in introgression, whereas chromosome architecture imposes consistent constraints. These findings highlight how replicated hybrid zones can disentangle contingent versus repeatable genomic responses during early stages of speciation with gene flow.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
16.7%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
3
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.6%
5
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
7
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.4%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.4%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
15
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
22
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%