Back

A Multi-Objective Scoring (MOS) Framework for Detecting Cross-Modal Spatial Similarity: Conceptual and Direct Formulations

Jarrahi, A.; Jones, A. R.; Tang, W.; Qi, H.; Crouch, A. C.

2026-04-13 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.04.09.717471 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial multi-omics methods allow researchers to study complex biological systems by integrating multiple molecular layers while preserving their spatial organization. However, integrating spatial transcriptomics and mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) remains challenging due to the differences between the two modalities, including sampling geometry, spatial resolution, signal scaling, and measurement principles. For example, 10x Genomics Visium captures transcriptomic data on a discrete hexagonal grid of spots; however, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) produces dense Cartesian pixel maps of molecular distributions. These differences make exact spatial co-registration difficult and limit the effectiveness of single-metric similarity approaches. Here, we introduce a Multi-Objective Scoring (MOS) framework designed to detect cross-modal spatial similarity without requiring exact pixel-to-pixel alignment. The MOS framework integrates multiple complementary spatial descriptors into a unified similarity score, including coordinate-based metrics (value correlation, importance-based Intersection-over-Union (IoU), and importance-map correlation) and descriptor-based metrics that capture higher-order spatial organization, such as spatial histograms, radial profiles, quadrant statistics, and Morans I spatial autocorrelation. These metrics are combined through a weighted ensemble model. This model calculates the weights using synthetic spatial datasets that simulate realistic tissue geometry, sampling differences, and spatial distortions. The framework was applied to a spatial multi-omics dataset from murine brain tissue, integrating spatial transcriptomics with MALDI-MSI lipidomics across young and aged control and Alzheimers disease (AD) models. Synthetic data validation results demonstrated strong pattern-matching performance (96.14% accuracy), and application to experimental data identified several MSI analyte features whose spatial distributions closely matched transcriptomic patterns. In particular, strong and reproducible associations were observed between myelin-related genes (Mbp and Plp1) and multiple analyte features enriched in white matter regions. Overall, whether applied conceptually or directly, the MOS framework provides a strong strategy for cross-modal spatial integration and offers a scalable tool for discovering spatial relationships across diverse multi-omics datasets and facilitating hypothesis generation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.8%
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
6
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
9
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
17
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
20
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%