Back

Using Virtual Patients to Predict Perceptual Outcomes for Optogenetic Sight Recovery Technologies

Mohan, V. B.; Yucel, E. I.; Fine, I.; Boynton, G. M.

2026-04-13 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.09.716230 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optogenetics is emerging as a powerful approach for partial vision restoration, with at least three ongoing clinical trials in humans testing novel light-sensitive proteins (opsins) in patients with inherited retinal degenerative disorders. These therapies aim to restore light responsiveness by introducing opsins into surviving retinal cells, such as bipolar or ganglion cells, enabling them to generate neural activity in response to visual stimuli. One ongoing difficulty in selecting promising opsins for clinical development is that there is no way to predict patient perceptual outcomes from optogenetically evoked neural activity as measured ex vivo. Here, we introduce a virtual patient framework that quantitatively links the sensitivity and speed of opsin-mediated retinal responses to predicted patient outcomes, and show how this framework can predict temporal contrast sensitivity functions - a well-established measure of perceptual performance - from microbial opsin photocurrent responses. Our simulations demonstrate that opsin sensitivity and kinetics jointly determine perceptual outcomes, and that enhancing sensitivity at the expense of temporal resolution can degrade the perception of fast-moving stimuli. This computational platform provides a generalizable tool for comparing and selecting the most effective opsins for clinical translation, thereby guiding the design and optimization of next-generation sight restoration strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 10%
14.4%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
12.1%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.0%
10
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.6%
14
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
16
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
17
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.3%
18
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%