Behavioural plasticity at the spatial-social interface: Predation risk modulates density-dependent breeding dispersion
Wawrzynowicz, M.; Kuczynski, L.
Show abstract
The spatial organisation of breeding populations fundamentally shapes individual fitness and scales up to influence broader population dynamics. While spatial patterns are often attributed to passive habitat filtering, they may alternatively emerge from active behavioural plasticity at the spatial-social interface, governed by density-dependent trade-offs. To test these competing mechanisms, we leveraged long-term, large-scale monitoring data of a loosely social, ground-nesting wader, the northern lapwing (Vanellus vanellus), across human-modified agricultural landscapes. We quantified fine-scale spatial breeding dispersion using a novel segment-count metric, the Normalised Spatial Dispersion Index (NSDI), and applied generalised additive mixed models (GAMMs) to evaluate the relative influence of local conspecific density, avian predation risk, habitat composition, and pre-breeding winter weather. We found no support for passive habitat filtering; broad-scale habitat composition did not predict spatial dispersion. Instead, spatial organisation was primarily driven by density-dependent biotic interactions. Under low predation risk, lapwings dispersed as local density increased, mitigating intraspecific competition. However, under high predation risk, this relationship inverted: lapwings aggregated at high local densities to enable communal defence, but dispersed at low densities to minimize nest detectability. Furthermore, warmer pre-breeding winter temperatures drove spatial clustering, likely by prematurely drying soils and forcing individuals into restricted micro-habitat bottlenecks. Our results demonstrate that spatial breeding strategies in loosely social species are highly plastic and strictly context-dependent. This plasticity dictates that group-level component Allee effects, such as the failure of communal defence, emerge dynamically rather than as fixed demographic traits. Conservation monitoring must account for this behavioural flexibility, as localized population collapses may accelerate if climate-driven habitat bottlenecks force aggregations under intense predation pressure. Integrating the spatial-social interface with Allee effect theory is therefore critical for understanding species persistence in changing landscapes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Maintenance of community function through compensation breaks down over time in a desert rodent community 93%
- Trophic cascade driven by behavioural fine-tuning as naive prey rapidly adjust to a novel predator 93%
- Multi-species mechanistic model of functional response provides new insights into predator-mediated interactions in a vertebrate community 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shifts from pulled to pushed range expansions caused by reduction of landscape connectivity 94%
- Geometric and demographic effects explain contrasting fragmentation-biodiversity relationships across scales 93%
- To disperse or compete? Coevolution of traits leads to a limited number of reproductive strategies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Generation time and seasonal migration explain variation in spatial population synchrony across European bird species 95%
- Social network analysis reveals context-dependent kinrelationships in wild sulphur-crested cockatoos, Cacatua galerita 94%
- Novel step selection analyses on energy landscapes reveal how linear features alter migrations of soaring birds 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The geography of metacommunities: landscape characteristics drive geographic variation in the assembly process through selecting species pool attributes 94%
- Adaptation and latitudinal gradients in species interactions: nest predation in birds 93%
- Understanding inter-individual social networks in mixed-species bird flocks 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.