Back

Feasibility of Volumetric Analysis using Bedside Ultra-Low-Field Portable Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Stockbridge, M. D.; Faria, A. V.; Neal, V.; Diaz-Carr, I.; Soule, Z.; Ahmad, Y. B.; Khanduja, S.; Whitman, G.; Hillis, A. E.; Cho, S.-M.

2026-04-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350481 medRxiv
Show abstract

The SAFE MRI ECMO (NCT05469139) study established the safety of ultra-low-field 64mT MRI in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the setting of intensive care and demonstrated that these images were highly sensitive in detecting acquired brain injuries. This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected observational data sought to expand on these findings in light of the crucial need for neurological monitoring while patients receive ECMO by evaluating the feasibility of volumetric analyses derived from ultra-low-field MR images. T2-weighted scans from thirty patients who received ultra-low-field MRI while undergoing ECMO at Johns Hopkins Hospital were analyzed using a volumetric pipeline to determine whole brain volume and volumes of total grey matter, total white matter, subcortical grey matter, ventricles, left hemisphere, right hemisphere, telencephalon, left and right lateral ventricles, the total intracranial volume, and the cerebellum. Segmented brain volumes in patients undergoing ECMO were comparable to measurements obtained using conventional field and ultra-low-field MRI in the absence of ECMO instrumentation. The subgroup analysis demonstrated subtle volumetric differences between patients supported with venoarterial ECMO and those receiving venovenous ECMO. These data provide the first evidence that ultra-low-field MRI provides volumetric measurements comparable to conventional field-strength MRI, even in the presence of ECMO circuitry, supporting its feasibility for neuroimaging in critically ill patients.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
3
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.9%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
7
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
11
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
21
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%