Back

The Hospital Murals Evaluation: A mixed-methods evaluation of the impact of murals on patients, healthcare workers, and visitors

Sajnani, N.; Foster, M. W.; Oshodi, Y.; Sodimu, K. A.; Kolnik, M.; Pokorn, M.; Simpson, N.; Shaw, T.; Willmoth, S.; Marino, M.; Trinder, L.; Akisanya, E.; Onyekachi, E.; Bahr, E.; Blanchette, V.; Assistant, R.; Bolt, E.; Gong, Q.; Fenning, H. M.; Komolafe, D. O.; Murden, R.; Omuku, N.; Rowe, C.; Sanhueza, C.; Steer, T.; Trupp, M. D.; White, N.; Wu, Y.

2026-04-13 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350479 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigated how hospital murals influence the experiences of patients, healthcare staff, and visitors across four sites. BackgroundEvidence shows that visual art in healthcare settings can improve well-being but few studies focus specifically on murals or compare their effects across cultural contexts. The Hospital Murals Evaluation project addresses this gap through an investigation of murals in hospitals in Nigeria, Slovenia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. MethodsUsing a mixed methods cross-sectional design, the study integrated surveys, interviews, and participatory photography. A total of 525 unique responses were collected from 229 patients (131 adult, 98 pediatric), 245 staff, 49 visitors, and 2 undisclosed. ResultsInterviews across all three participant groups (n=115) revealed themes of positive affects, perception of care, as well as stress or indifference. Surveys (n=327) showed moderate positive correlations between mural viewing and positive emotions among patients, and between mural exposure and well-being, positive emotions, social connection, and workplace belonging among staff in the UK and USA, with null findings for staff in Nigeria and Slovenia. Participatory photography (n=83) illustrated how murals conveyed comfort, though abstract or poorly placed murals sometimes evoked discomfort. Meta-inferences across the methods indicate that viewing murals were associated with positive emotions for patients and did not induce negative emotions for staff or visitors. ConclusionMurals act as health-promoting infrastructure that can enhance well-being, foster positive experiences, and signal intentions of care. The findings highlight the need for culturally attuned designs to create healthcare environments that nurture well-being.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.8%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
4
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
11
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
23
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%