Back

Mutation timing, accumulation and selection in the male germline shape inheritance risk for developmental disorders

Neville, M. D. C.; Neuser, S.; Sanghvi, R.; Christopher, J.; Roberts, K.; Smith, K.; ONeill, L.; Hayes, J.; Cagan, A.; Hurles, M. E.; Goriely, A.; Abou Jamra, R.; Rahbari, R.

2026-04-13 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350474 medRxiv
Show abstract

De novo mutations (DNMs) arising in the parental germline are a major cause of severe developmental disorders. While most DNMs originate in the paternal germline, it remains unclear whether fathers of affected children carry a systematically altered burden of transmissible germline risk, or whether disease largely reflects stochastic outcomes of shared population-wide mutational processes. Here, we combined whole-genome sequencing of 168 parent-child trios with ultra-accurate duplex sequencing of paternal sperm to directly relate transmitted DNMs to the broader mutational and selective landscape of the male germline. In 127 fathers, sperm mutation burden and mutational spectra were indistinguishable from population reference cohorts. Positive selection metrics were likewise concordant, with a global dN/dS of 1.56 (95% CI 1.45-1.67) compared to 1.44 (95% CI 1.17-1.77) in controls and 28 of 32 significantly selected genes overlapping with prior findings. Six fathers harboured a pathogenic early mosaic variant detectable in sperm at allele fractions that ranged from 0.7% to 14.8%. Although these variants generated substantial individual-level risk outliers, they accounted for only [~]11% of the aggregated exome pathogenic burden across the cohort. The remaining burden was distributed across low-VAF mutations, including positively selected driver variants and other rare mutations accumulating with paternal age. Together, these results show that transmissible de novo disease risk is governed primarily by universal germline mutational and selective processes, while early developmental mosaicism produces uncommon but clinically meaningful deviations. This integrated view clarifies how mutation timing, age-associated accumulation and germline selection jointly shape inheritance risk.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.0%
2
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
4
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.2%
5
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
8
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
11
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 24%
2.7%
13
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
16
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
17
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%