Identifying trial-relevant concepts of interest in HSP: insights from an international patient-voice study in >600 individuals
Ademi, M.; Morales Saute, J. A.; Dubec-Fleury, C.; Greenfield, J.; Wallis, R.; Gobeil, C.; Linton, L. R.; Nadke, A.; Horvath, R.; Klebe, S.; Santorelli, F.; Vural, A.; van de Warrenburg, B.; Gagnon, C.; Synofzik, M.; PROSPAX Consortium, ; Tezenas du Montcel, S.; Schuele, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundAs therapeutic options emerge for hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP), clinical trials require outcome measures that reflect disease aspects most important to patients. Patient priorities in HSP remain poorly defined. This study aimed to develop a regulatory-compliant framework of patient-prioritised health domains to evaluate treatment response in clinical trials. MethodsPatient-reported data on health impacts were collected via two multinational, multilingual online surveys conducted sequentially, including 616 and 504 patients across the clinical and genetic spectrum of HSP. Using a staged approach, we examined prevalence, relevance, and severity, focusing on health impacts that were (i) common (ii) sensitive to disease progression, (iii) highly relevant to patients, and (iv) showed strong severity-relevance correlation. Patient representatives contributed centrally to study design and prioritisation. FindingsOur patient-focused analysis yielded five highly prevalent and relevant core health domains: mobility, lower body function, autonomic dysregulation, pain, and psychosocial aspects. Ambulation and lower body function ranked highest across all disease stages. Among non-motor impacts, reduced ability to work, bladder incontinence, and fatigue were most relevant. In mild disease stages, reduced walking distance, reduced walking speed, and the urgency to empty the bladder were the most frequent and most relevant health impact. InterpretationThis work provides the most comprehensive patient-reported and disease stage specific profiling of HSP health impacts to date. It lays the necessary groundwork for developing patient-focused outcome tools capable of capturing treatment effects in future trials.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attributes and predictors of Long-COVID: analysis of COVID cases and their symptoms collected by the Covid Symptoms Study App 91%
- Early Anakinra Treatment for COVID-19 Guided by Urokinase Plasminogen Receptor 88%
- Deaths in Children and Young People in England following SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first pandemic year: a national study using linked mandatory child death reporting data 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Refinement of post-COVID condition core symptoms, subtypes, determinants, and health impacts: A cohort study integrating real-world data and patient-reported outcomes 92%
- Prognostic Clinical and Biological Markers for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disease Progression: Validation and Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Analysis 91%
- A systematic analysis of the contribution of genetics to multimorbidity and comparisons with primary care data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Acetyl-L-leucine for Niemann-Pick type C – a multi-national, rater-blinded phase II trial 90%
- Coffee, smoking and aspirin are associated with age at onset and clinical severity in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease 90%
- Improving prediction models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) using polygenic, pre-existing conditions, and survey-based risk scores in the UK Biobank 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.