Back

Identifying trial-relevant concepts of interest in HSP: insights from an international patient-voice study in >600 individuals

Ademi, M.; Morales Saute, J. A.; Dubec-Fleury, C.; Greenfield, J.; Wallis, R.; Gobeil, C.; Linton, L. R.; Nadke, A.; Horvath, R.; Klebe, S.; Santorelli, F.; Vural, A.; van de Warrenburg, B.; Gagnon, C.; Synofzik, M.; PROSPAX Consortium, ; Tezenas du Montcel, S.; Schuele, R.

2026-04-10 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.09.26350392 medRxiv
Show abstract

As therapeutic options emerge for hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSP), clinical trials require outcome measures that reflect disease aspects most important to patients. Patient priorities in HSP remain poorly defined. This study aimed to develop a regulatory-compliant framework of patient-prioritised health domains to evaluate treatment response in clinical trials. Patient-reported data on health impacts were collected via two multinational, multilingual online surveys conducted sequentially, including 616 and 504 patients across the clinical and genetic spectrum of HSP. Using a staged approach, we examined prevalence, relevance, and severity, focusing on health impacts that were (i) common (ii) sensitive to disease progression, (iii) highly relevant to patients, and (iv) showed strong severity-relevance correlation. Patient representatives contributed centrally to study design and prioritisation. Our patient-focused analysis yielded five highly prevalent and relevant core health domains: mobility, lower body function, autonomic dysregulation, pain, and psychosocial aspects. Ambulation and lower body function ranked highest across all disease stages. Among non-motor impacts, reduced ability to work, bladder incontinence, and fatigue were most relevant. In mild disease stages, reduced walking distance, reduced walking speed, and the urgency to empty the bladder were the most frequent and most relevant health impact. This work provides the most comprehensive patient-reported and disease stage specific profiling of HSP health impacts to date. It lays the necessary groundwork for developing patient-focused outcome tools capable of capturing treatment effects in future trials.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
2
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
3
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
4
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
6
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
14
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
20
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
21
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
28
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%