Back

Nocturnal and Diurnal Measures of Autonomic Function in Idiopathic Hypersomnia and Type 1 Narcolepsy

Zitser, J.; Baldelli, L.; Taha, H. B.; Sibal, O.; Chiaro, G.; Cecere, A.; Barletta, G.; Cortelli, P.; Guaraldi, P.; Miglis, M. G.

2026-04-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.04.09.26349889 medRxiv
Show abstract

Study ObjectivesIdiopathic hypersomnia (IH) is a central nervous system hypersomnia frequently accompanied by autonomic symptoms, yet objective physiological data are limited. We sought to characterize autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction in IH using nocturnal heart rate variability (HRV) and diurnal autonomic reflex testing (ART), compared to individuals with type 1 narcolepsy (NT1) and healthy controls (HCs). MethodsTwenty-four adults with IH, 10 with NT1, and 14 HCs underwent overnight video polysomnography with HRV analyses in time and frequency domains during stable slow-wave sleep and REM sleep. Comprehensive ART included sympathetic adrenergic (head-up tilt (HUT), Valsalva BP responses), parasympathetic cardiovagal (HRV to deep breathing, Valsalva ratio), and sudomotor (Q-Sweat) measures. ResultsIH participants were predominantly female, with over half reporting long sleep duration. Compared to NT1 and HC, participants with IH demonstrated a greater magnitude of orthostatic tachycardia on tilt ({Delta}HR 41.0 {+/-} 16.3 vs. 26.3 {+/-} 9.3 vs. 30.8 {+/-} 9.3 bpm, p = 0.0086), as well as frequent sudomotor dysfunction (64.3%). IH participants demonstrated greater nocturnal and REM HR with reduced parasympathetic indices during REM, indicating diminished vagal modulation compared with HCs ConclusionsIH is characterized by a distinct pattern of autonomic dysfunction, including pronounced orthostatic tachycardia, frequent sudomotor abnormalities, and reduced parasympathetic activity during sleep. These findings provide objective physiological evidence of ANS involvement in IH and delineate features that distinguish IH from NT1 and HCs.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.