Back

AENEAS Project: First real-time intraoperative application of machine vision-based anatomical guidance in neurosurgery

Sarwin, G.; Ricciuti, V.; Staartjes, V. E.; Carretta, A.; Daher, N.; Li, Z.; Regli, L.; Mazzatenta, D.; Zoli, M.; Seungjun, R.; Konukoglu, E.; Serra, C.

2026-04-11 surgery
10.64898/2026.04.09.26348607 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: We report the first intraoperative deployment of a real-time machine vision system in neurosurgery, derived from our previous anatomical detection work, automatically identifying structures during endoscopic endonasal surgery. Existing systems demonstrate promising performance in offline anatomical recognition, yet so far none have been implemented during live operations. Methods: A real-time anatomy detection model was trained using the YOLOv8 architecture (Ultralytics). Following training completion in the PyTorch environment, the model was exported to ONNX format and further optimized using the NVIDIA TensorRT engine. Deployment was carried out using the NVIDIA Holoscan SDK, the system ran on an NVIDIA Clara AGX developer kit. We used the model for real-time recognition of intraoperative anatomical structures and compared it with the same video labelled manually as reference. Model performance was reported using the average precision at an intersection-over-union threshold of 0.5 (AP50). Furthermore, end-to-end delay from frame acquisition to the display of the annotated output was measured. Results: A mean AP50 of 0.56 was achieved. The model demonstrated reliable detection of the most relevant landmarks in the transsphenoidal corridor. The mean end-to-end latency of the model was 47.81 ms (median 46.57 ms). Conclusion: For the first time, we demonstrate that clinical-grade, real-time machine-vision assistance during neurosurgery is feasible and can provide continuous, automated anatomical guidance from the surgical field. This approach may enhance intraoperative orientation, reduce cognitive load, and offer a powerful tool for surgical training. These findings represent an initial step toward integrating real-time AI support into routine neurosurgical workflows.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
6
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
11
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
18
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Ophthalmology Science
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
23
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
26
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%