Back

Thermodynamic phase-field modelling predicts non-linear evolution of tumour spheroid dynamics

McNamara, R.; Monsalve-Bravo, G. M.; Stein, S. R.; Francis, G. D.; Allenby, M. C.

2026-04-10 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.08.717345 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Patient-derived tumour spheroids are increasingly used as engineered three-dimensional tissue models for studying tumour growth, nutrient limitation, and therapeutic response. However, extracting quantitative, mechanistically interpretable information from longitudinal imaging data remains challenging. Here, we present a three-dimensional phase-field framework for modelling patient-derived tumour spheroids as continuum, self-organising tissues. The model captures the coupled evolution of viable and necrotic cell fractions through nutrient-limited growth, death, and mechanically and thermodynamically mediated motion, using seven biologically interpretable effective parameters. Key experimental observables emerge naturally from nutrient-growth coupling, without imposing explicit species interfaces or quiescent layers. The framework was quantitatively calibrated against longitudinal imaging data from melanoma spheroids across two cell lines and three initial seeding densities. Across all conditions, simulations reproduced the temporal evolution of all measured observables with low relative error ({approx} 3{sigma} of experimental data), and direct comparison with an established Greenspan-type ODE model demonstrated comparable or improved predictive accuracy. Parameter identifiability analysis revealed weak individual parameter constraints, yet model predictions remained robust, a profile consistent with biological models. We demonstrate that a general PDE-based growth framework can match or outperform a dedicated spheroid model while remaining fully biologically interpretable. Beyond predictive accuracy, the phase-field formulation naturally resolves internal mechanical structure, providing access to quantities that are not directly experimentally observable. These results establish that mechanistically grounded continuum models can be quantitatively calibrated to routine spheroid imaging data, offering a foundation for integrating spatial and mechanical information into the interpretation of organoid-based assays. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=77 SRC="FIGDIR/small/717345v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (21K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cb3b45org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a053d5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dffe34org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aa0b72_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.7%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
22.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
4
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
5
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
7
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
13
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.1%
15
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%
27
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%