Back

Natural leaf shape variation reveals diverse transcriptional targets of GmJAG1 during soybean leaf development

Tamang, B. G.; Kramer, C.; Ainsworth, E.

2026-04-11 plant biology
10.64898/2026.04.08.717315 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The JAGGED transcription factor family regulates lateral organ development across angiosperms. In soybean (Glycine max Merr.), a D9H mutation in the EAR repression motif of GmJAG1 causes a narrow leaflet phenotype and explains over 70% of phenotypic variance in leaf shape. Because this mutation does not affect the zinc finger DNA-binding domain, both alleles bind identical targets but differ in repressor recruitment. Previous studies mapped GmJAG1 binding sites, but the functional targets controlling leaf morphology are uncharacterized. Here, we used comparative transcriptomics across four soybean genotypes with contrasting leaf shape, spanning a developmental time series from shoot apex to mature leaf, and identified 1,567 candidate target genes. GmJAG1 expression was confined to the shoot apex, yet 99.1% of candidate targets maintained differential expression throughout development. We found that neither Kip-Related Protein (KRP) cell cycle inhibitors nor Cyclin-Dependent Kinases (CDKs) showed differential expression despite binding evidence in Arabidopsis. However, D-type cyclins were upregulated in narrow-leaf genotypes suggesting cyclin-mediated rather than KRP-mediated cell cycle regulation in soybean. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of auxin (1.8-fold, P = 0.02) and salicylic acid (4-fold, P = 0.016) genes among JAG1D9H targets. Filtering by differential expression, binding data, phenotype correlation, and co-expression network membership identified 79 high-confidence targets, including orthologs of NPH3 (phototropin-mediated leaf flattening), MIK2 (cell wall integrity sensing), RD22 (ABA-responsive stress signaling), and SCL23 (GRAS transcription factor in bundle sheath development). These candidates provide targets for functional validation and breeding in legumes.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
5
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
6
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
9
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
11
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.4%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
15
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
17
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
22
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.5%