Back

Cyclome: Large-scale replica-exchange dynamics of 930 cyclic peptide reveal thermal stability and critical metal-binding behavior

Sajeevan, K. A.; Gates, H.; Raghunath, V. S.; Tan, C. P. H.; Danurdoro, R.; Young, J.; Chowdhury, R.

2026-04-12 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.04.08.717280 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cyclic peptides are recognized as versatile scaffolds for therapeutic and functional applications due to their structural stability and resistance to degradation. Despite this promise, systematic analysis and prediction of their thermal stability remain limited by fragmented data resources, inadequate sequence comparison methods, and the lack of cyclicity-aware computational models. We provide a comprehensive, multi-scale computational framework to characterize cyclic peptides. First, we unified four fragmented public repositories of cyclic peptides into a single largest curated resource of 930 cyclic peptides, Cyclome930. This integrates cyclic topology, sequence, experimental structural coordinates, and source organism annotations into a consistently featurized dataset. Cyclome930 thus expands the dataset of annotated cyclic peptides by [~]3.4 fold (from 276 to 930). Second, we developed a novel cyclic sequence alignment algorithm that explicitly accounts for rotational symmetry and knot topology, enabling more accurate scoring of sequence similarity than conventional linear alignments. Third, we investigate the thermal stability of cyclic peptides using extensive all-atom replica-exchange molecular dynamics (100ns; REMD) simulations, allowing conformational sampling across 298 K - 400 K and track its stress tensors with increasing temperature. Finally, these simulation-derived thermo-stability metrics were used to train a machine learning model to predict cyclic peptide melting points from sequence and topology (STop2Melt). Crucially, the model introduces cyclicity-aware embeddings derived from ESMc representations coupled with cyclic offset vector, capturing the peptides knot topology. STop2Melt achieved strong predictive performance on held-out peptides and outperforms baseline methods that neglect cyclic structure. Finally, we scored Cyclome930 (cyclic ligands) for critical mineral metal binding using a multi-classifier model (CritiCL). To our knowledge, Cyclome930 represents the first effort in peptide literature to integrate physics-based temperature ramped simulations, cyclic sequence similarity scoring, machine learning for thermal stability prediction and scoring them for critical metal binding. Cyclicity-aware computational toolchains (cyclome930.studio/) provide a foundational resource for computational design of stable cyclic peptide prototype libraries thereby annotating and expanding genomic islands linked to critical mineral recovery.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.1%
3
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.1%
4
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
5
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.6%
8
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
16
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.3%
20
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
23
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
25
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%