Back

Humans as predator of the biosphere: technological modulation of consumer/resource dynamics and its implications for sustainability

Weinberger, V. P.; Zalaquett, N.; Lima, M.

2026-04-10 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.08.717266 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans are just another species on Earth, but modern telecoupled societies and their socioeconomies impose immense consumption demands on the biosphere, detaching from common ecological rules. Starting from a simple ecological consumer-resource model, with humans as the consumers and terrestrial organic carbon (i.e., the biosphere) as the resource, we assume that technology modulates both human carrying capacity,{nu} 0, and the rate of biosphere consumption, 0. Three different functional-relation scenarios were tested, modulated by parameter a. In all three scenarios, equilibria and stability directly depended on the relative role that technology played in the model parameters, or the compound technological impact ({epsilon} {equiv} 0{nu}0). Moreover, two of the three scenarios showed Hopf bifurcations and regions with no equilibrium. The models were parameterized and fitted to actual data using a trajectory of more than 150 years. These analyses suggest that we are currently in a stable oscillatory spiral with no immediate Hopf bifurcation threat, but within a trajectory that continuously depletes the biosphere and approaches a collapse in human population size if no changes are made in the relationship that technology has with growth (i.e.,{nu} 0) versus consumption (i.e., 0) dynamics. Because our predatory dynamics also appear to have shifted from regular predator- prey dynamics toward a supply-demand scenario, with persistently increasing values, the threat of a Hopf bifurcation is now present in our trajectory: changes in the stability of the coexistence equilibrium may arise. This simple model warns that we must pay closer attention to the predatory relations that our technologies are creating with bio-sphere dynamics, in a way that goes beyond population numbers and technological development alone.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.0%
3
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 15%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
9
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
18
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
27
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%