Back

Automated Extraction and Meta-Analysis of a Century of Motor-Unit Research with NeuromechaniX

Del Vecchio, A.; Enoka, R. M.

2026-04-10 physiology
10.64898/2026.04.08.717204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The scientific literature on human motor units and electromyography (EMG) spans over a century (1925-2025), comprising research impossible to synthesize manually. We introduce NeuromechaniX, a domain-specific platform for automated extraction and meta-analysis of this literature. The core component, MUscraper, is a large language model pipeline that extracts approximately 200 structured metadata fields, organized into 17 major sections spanning participant demographics, EMG acquisition parameters, muscle identification, task protocols, decomposition methods, and motor-unit outcomes, from [~]2,000 publications on human limb muscles. This automated extraction transforms heterogeneous narrative reports into a standardized, queryable database at a scale not achievable through manual review. From this dataset, we analyzed motor-unit discharge rate across 208 studies examining seven muscles. Our analyses reveal that discharge rates differ significantly among muscles (p<0.001), with biceps brachii exhibiting the highest rates (15.9 pps), followed by first dorsal interosseous (13.7 pps) and tibialis anterior (13.5 pps), whereas gastrocnemius (11.3 pps), the vastii muscles (11.5 pps) and soleus show the lowest rates (9.9 pps). Sex-stratified analysis shows females exhibit higher discharge rates than males (14.5 vs 11.9 pps; Cohens d=0.38, p=0.018). In contrast, age-stratified analysis reveals non-significant differences between young and older adults (d=-0.24, p=0.072). Collectively, these results show that current views of human motor units are limited to a few muscles, with little data on females and older adults. The complete structured database is available through an open-access interactive platform (https://neuro-mechanix.com/metadata), enabling researchers to explore, filter, and download the extracted metadata. NeuromechaniX provides infrastructure for large-scale meta-research, identification of literature gaps, and hypothesis generation for the neuromechanics community.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
5
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.1%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
10
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
12
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
14
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
15
Skeletal Muscle
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
20
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
21
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%