Back

Early Emergence of Auditory Quantity Discrimination in Domestic Chicks

Eccher, E.; Salva, O. R.; Chiandetti, C.; Vallortigara, G.

2026-04-09 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.04.08.717196 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Numerical abilities are widespread in the animal kingdom and are not exclusive to humans. Domestic chicks (Gallus gallus) have been shown to discriminate numerosities spontaneously, but prior research has focused exclusively on the visual modality. Whether chicks can discriminate numerical information in the auditory domain remains unknown, despite evidence that they can perceive other auditory features such as tone and rhythm. In this study, we investigated spontaneous numerical discrimination in the auditory modality in naive domestic chicks. In Experiment 1, newly-hatched chicks were tested for their ability to discriminate between two auditory sequences differing in numerosity (4 vs. 12 identical sounds), with and without controlling for continuous variables such as duration and total sound amount. Experiment 2 examined chicks filial imprinting responses to familiar or unfamiliar numerosities. Experiment 3 controlled for potential spontaneous preferences for a single longer sound versus a shorter one. Our results showed a preference for the 12-sound sequence only when duration and total sound amount were not matched. When these continuous variables were controlled, no spontaneous numerical preference emerged. Experiment 2 revealed an overall preference for the 12-sound sequence regardless of imprinting conditions, while Experiment 3 confirmed that chicks do not have an inherent preference for longer sounds. These findings suggest that chicks are sensitive to overall magnitude in the auditory domain but do not spontaneously discriminate numerical differences when other continuous variables are held constant. Future studies will explore how specific stimulus features, such as heterogeneity of sounds, influence these preferences.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 1%
17.2%
2
Behavioural Processes
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.0%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
Animal Cognition
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
19
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
20
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
22
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Physiology & Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Ethology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%