Back

Brief report on the development of patient-derived lung cancer organoids with keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma morphology

O'Sullivan, E.; Cahill, C.; O'Brien, R. M.; Elgenaidi, I. S.; McManus, G.; Mc Cormack, W.; Hurley, S.; Staunton, L. M.; Nicholson, S.; Finn, S.; Ryan, R.; Fitzmaurice, G. J.; Lowery, M. A.; O'Sullivan, J.; Gately, K.

2026-04-10 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.08.717166 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNovel therapeutic options are urgently required to improve outcomes and survival for patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). In particular, understanding the unique histological features that define LUSC is essential to improving lung cancer mortality. Many pre-clinical models fail to accurately represent intratumour heterogeneity and recapitulate the tumour microenvironment. This is partly responsible for the poor translation of clinical findings to approved therapies. Our objective was to investigate whether patient-derived organoids, replicate the histological morphological, and structural features of keratinizing LUSC, a poor prognostic subtype of lung cancer. MethodsOrganoid cultures were established and maintained from two patients presenting with keratinizing lung squamous cell carcinomas. Immunofluorescent staining of individual organoids and confocal microscopy was performed to confirm expression of tumour markers. Whole organoid domes were fixed, and immunofluorescent staining and imaging was performed to investigate the structural features of the organoid cultures. Findings were compared with histopathological features of the original tumour tissue. ResultsPatient-derived organoids expressed tumour markers specific to the squamous cell carcinoma subtype of non-small cell lung cancer, which were confirmed to be expressed in the parent tissue. Within organoid cultures, keratin pearl structures spontaneously developed, matching the keratinizing pattern demonstrated by hematoxylin and eosin staining of the original tumour. ConclusionsPatient-derived organoids have the capability to replicate key histological features of their parent tumour. This high degree of fidelity makes these 3D models an important and valuable tool for understanding complex tumour biology and as a platform for preclinical drug testing to advance novel therapies into the clinic.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
5
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
7
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
12
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
14
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%