Back

Real-time, label-free assessment of cell fusion dynamics by high-content imaging

Shinde, S.; Bhide, A.; RASAL, P.; Modi, D.

2026-04-10 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.04.08.717136 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell-cell fusion is a fundamental biological process underlying diverse physiological and pathological phenomena, yet its quantitative analysis remains methodologically challenging due to its dynamic, heterogeneous, and multistep nature. Existing approaches to assess fusion largely rely on endpoint assays or manual scoring, limiting temporal resolution, scalability, and reproducibility. Here, we present a label-free, high-content live-cell imaging pipeline for real-time quantification of cell fusion dynamics, developed and validated using trophoblast syncytialization as a model system. The method integrates automated image acquisition with a reproducible, stepwise analysis workflow combining supervised texture-based segmentation, morphology-based measurements, and intensity-independent texture analysis. We define quantitative metrics, including the ratio of total cluster area to the number of detected clusters and cytoplasmic granularity features, that together discriminate bona fide fusion events from non-fusion-related cellular clustering or proliferation. Using canonical pharmacological inducers and inhibitors of fusion, we demonstrate the specificity and sensitivity of these parameters for detecting fusion-associated remodeling over time. We further demonstrate the scalability of the pipeline through high-throughput screening of biologically relevant growth factors, hormones, and inhibitors, enabling classification of modulators based on their independent, synergistic, or antagonistic effects on fusion dynamics. Consistent results obtained in an independent model further support its potential applications to additional fusion systems. By providing a robust, reproducible, and adaptable framework for time-resolved fusion analysis, this methodology bridges the gap between qualitative observation and quantitative kinetic assessment. Thus, the approach could be readily extended to other cell fusion systems following system-specific parameter optimization, offering a versatile platform for both mechanistic studies and discovery-driven screening applications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 2%
23.4%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.4%
3
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
4
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.0%
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
11
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.2%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
13
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.5%
16
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.5%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
24
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Cell Calcium
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
27
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
29
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%