Algorithm-Based Model for Gastrointestinal and Liver Histopathological Analysis Using VGG16 and Specialized Stains: Statistical Validation of Thresholds in AI-Driven Digital Pathology
Adeluwoye, A. O.; Gbadegesin, M. O.; James, F. M.; Otegbade, P. S.; Alabetutu, A.
Show abstract
Digital pathology, coupled with advanced image recognition algorithms, represents a transformative frontier in histopathological diagnosis. This sub-Saharan African laboratorys exploratory study investigates the application of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, specifically leveraging the VGG16 architecture with transfer learning, for automated analysis and classification of selected gastrointestinal (GIT) and liver tissue samples, incorporating both routine and specialized staining protocols. The study utilized a dataset comprising 114 samples (18 liver, 96 GIT images) derived from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Specialized staining techniques included Alcian Yellow for GIT mucin visualization and Massons Trichrome for liver fibrosis assessment, alongside conventional H&E staining. Model performance was evaluated using statistical methodologies including Wilson Score confidence intervals (CI), Bayesian probability assessment, and effect size analysis. Results reveal a striking dichotomy in model performance. The GIT tissue model achieved perfect classification accuracy (100% test accuracy) with exceptional statistical significance (Z=10.0, p<0.0001), Wilson CI [96.29%, 99.99%], Cohens h=1.571, and Bayesian probability >99.99%. Conversely, the liver tissue model demonstrated diagnostic failure (42.86% test accuracy), with Z=-1.428, p=0.9236, Wilson CI [33.59%, 52.65%], Cohens h=-0.144, and Bayesian probability of 7.64%. This performance divergence correlates with training data availability, as the liver dataset fell far below empirically established thresholds (>100-200 samples) for reliable classification. The liver models failure reveals limitations in transfer learning with insufficient data. These findings underscore critical implications for AI-enhanced digital pathology, demonstrating potential deployment of the GIT model as a promising one that supports tissue-specific model development.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 95%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 94%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 93%
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 93%
- tUbe net: a generalisable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.