Back

From Chaos to Care: Personalized AI for Early Cardiac Arrhythmia Warning

Halder, S.; Kim, C. M.; Periwal, V.

2026-04-10 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350403 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiac arrhythmias are abnormal heart rhythms characterized by disordered electrical dynamics that impair cardiac function and pose a major global burden of morbidity and mortality. Early and accurate prediction of arrhythmic anomalies from physiological time series is crucial for effective intervention, yet remains challenging due to the nonlinear, nonstationary, and individualized nature of cardiac dynamics. Despite significant advances in machine learning-based arrhythmia detection, most existing methods operate as static classifiers on electrocardiographic signals and lack online prediction, patient-specific adaptation, and mechanistic interpretability. From a dynamical-systems perspective, arrhythmias represent qualitative regime transitions, often preceded by subtle, temporally extended deviations that are difficult to detect in real time. Here we introduce CASCADE (Chaotic Attractor Sensitivity for Cardiac Anomaly Detection), an online and personalized anomaly forecasting framework built on a special type of reservoir computing called Dynamical Systems Machine Learning (DynML). DynML employs ensembles of continuous-time nonlinear dynamical systems as chaotic reservoirs to reconstruct and forecast short-term cardiac dynamics on a beat-to-beat basis, training only a linear readout. This design enables efficient online adaptation without retraining the underlying dynamical model. Rather than relying on static beat-level classification, CASCADE identifies arrhythmic events as failures of short-term predictability, manifested as statistically significant deviations between predicted and observed dynamics relative to subject-specific baselines. Detection performance is governed by the intrinsic dynamical complexity of the reservoir, quantified by topological entropy. Reservoirs operating near critical entropy regimes optimally amplify subtle, temporally extended irregularities in heartbeat dynamics, rendering incipient arrhythmic signatures linearly separable at the readout level. Topological entropy thus serves both as a predictor of model performance and a principled control parameter for reservoir design. When evaluated on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia dataset, CASCADE achieved consistently high F1 scores, precision, recall, and overall accuracy across diverse patient populations, demonstrating strong generalizability across clinical and real-world settings. By integrating chaotic reservoir computing, entropy-guided tuning, and online personalized forecasting, CASCADE reframes arrhythmia detection as a problem of dynamical regime transition rather than static classification. This perspective provides a scalable, interpretable, and computationally efficient framework for real-time cardiac monitoring and early-warning clinical decision support.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
6
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.6%
7
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
11
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.4%
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
17
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
20
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
21
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
22
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
24
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.2%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
26
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
28
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%