Back

Easily Scalable, Rapidly Deployable Mechanical Ventilator For Pandemic Health Crises In Resource-Limited Areas

Farre, R.; Salama, R.; Rodriguez-Lazaro, M. A.; Kiarostami, K.; Fernandez-Barat, L.; Oliveira, V. D. C.; Torres, A.; Farre, N.; Dinh-Xuan, A. T.; Gozal, D.; Otero, J.

2026-04-11 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350386 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical shortages of mechanical ventilators, particularly in low-resource settings. Disruptions in global supply chains and dependence on specialized components highlighted the need for scalable, locally manufacturing alternatives for emergency respiratory support. AimTo describe and evaluate a simplified, supply-chain-independent mechanical ventilator assembled from widely available automotive and simple hardware components, and intended as a last-resort solution. MethodsThe ventilator is based on a reciprocating air pump driven by an automotive windshield wiper motor coupled to parallel shaft bellows and readily assembled passive membrane valves, only requiring materials available from standard hardware retailers, minimal tools, and basic manual skills. Ventilator performance was assessed through bench testing using a patient model simulating severe lung disease in an adult (R=20 cmH2O{middle dot}s/L, C=15 mL/cmH2O) and pediatric (R=50 cmH2O{middle dot}s/L, C=10 mL/cmH2O) patients. Realistic proof of concept was performed in four mechanically ventilated 50-kg pigs. ResultsThe device delivered tidal volumes up to 600 mL and respiratory rates up to 45 breaths/min with PEEP up to 10 cmH2O, covering pediatric and adult ventilation ranges. In vivo testing showed that the ventilator maintained arterial blood gases within the targeted range. Technical details for ventilator construction are provided in an open-source video tutorial. DiscussionThis low-cost ventilator demonstrated adequate performance under demanding conditions. Although not a substitute for commercial intensive care ventilators, its simplicity, autonomy, and independence from fragile supply chains provide a potentially life-saving option in resource-constrained emergency scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
24.3%
2
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.5%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
7
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
8
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
16
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%