Back

The impact of non-invasive prehabilitation before surgery on emotional well-being in neuro-oncology patients: Insights from the Prehabilita project

Brault-Boixader, N.; Roca-Ventura, A.; Delgado-Gallen, S.; Buloz-Osorio, E.; Perellon-Alfonso, R.; Hung Au, C.; Bartres-Faz, D.; Pascual-Leone, A.; Tormos Munoz, J. M.; Abellaneda-Perez, K.; Prehabilita Working Group,

2026-04-12 oncology
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350382 medRxiv
Show abstract

Prehabilitation (PRH) is a preoperative process aimed at optimizing patients functional capacity to improve surgical outcomes and overall well-being. While its physical and cognitive benefits are increasingly documented, its emotional impact, particularly in neuro-oncology patients, remains less explored. This study assessed the psychological effects of a PRH program on 29 brain tumor patients. The primary outcome, emotional well-being, was measured using quality of life and emotional distress metrices. Secondary outcomes included perceived stress levels and control attitudes. Additionally, qualitative data from structured interviews provided further insights into the psychological effects of the intervention. The results indicated significant improvements in quality of life and reductions in emotional distress, particularly among women. While perceived stress levels remained stable, control attitudes showed an increase. Qualitative analysis further highlighted the positive changes in the control sense and identified additional factors, such as the importance of social support sources during the PRH process. Overall, these findings suggest that PRH interventions play a significant role in enhancing emotional well-being among neuro-oncological patients in the preoperative phase. These results underscore the importance of implementing comprehensive and personalized PRH approaches to optimize clinical status both before and after surgery, thereby promoting sustained psychological benefits in this population. This study is based on data collected at Institut Guttmann in Barcelona in the context of the Prehabilita project (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05844605; registration date: 06/05/2023).

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.7%
3
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
8
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
12
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
13
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
16
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
20
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%