Back

Long-term follow-up of the public health impacts and co-benefits of an urban greenway intervention: A 15-year natural experiment evaluation

Nguyen, D.; Tate, C.; Akaraci, S.; Wang, R.; Kee, F.; Mullineaux, S.; ONeill, C.; Cleland, C.; Murtagh, B.; Ellis, G.; Bryan, D.; Longo, A.; Garcia, L.; Clarke, M.; Hunter, R. F.

2026-04-11 public and global health
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350381 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEvidence on the long-term impact of urban green and blue spaces (UGBS) interventions remains limited. This study is a 15-year evaluation of an urban greenway development in Belfast (United Kingdom), assessing the potential effects of this UGBS intervention on physical activity (PA), mental wellbeing and co-benefits. MethodsUsing quasi-experimental design, a repeated cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2010 (baseline), 2017 (post-opening) and 2023 (long-term follow-up) with about 1,200 adults participated each wave. Outcomes included PA, mental wellbeing, general health, quality of life, social capital and environmental perception. Multilevel mixed-effect regressions were performed to examine within-group changes at long-term follow-up. Difference-in-differences analysis investigated the between-group changes that might be attributed to the greenway. Additional comparative analyses included distance-decay analysis and comparison with population trends in Northern Ireland. ResultsAt six years after completion, the greenway intervention appears to buffer a decline in duration of PA - mainly from moderate-intensity activity (decline lower by 118.6 min/week, 95%CI: 3.9-232.2) but with no significant impact on the proportion of the population meeting the recommended PA level. The intervention is associated with a smaller decline in self-rated health (4.98 units; 95%CI: 0.62-9.34) relative to control group. Intervention association with mental wellbeing was positive but not significant (p=0.30). The greenway also showed positive effects on social capital and environmental perceptions, with impacts most evident in improving safety and trust in the local area. ConclusionThis study provides evidence to support the public health impact of UGBS and its long-term health and social benefits.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.5%
5
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
6
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
13
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
15
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
17
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%