Back

A high-throughput Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) serology test strip for nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk screening

Warner, B. E.; Patel, J.; Satterwhite, R.; Wang, R.; Adams-Haduch, J.; Koh, W.-P.; Yuan, J.-M.; Shair, K. H. Y.

2026-04-13 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350329 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAntibodies to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) proteins can predict nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) risk. We previously defined a prototype EBNA1 protein panel and multiplex immunoblot assay that distinguishes NPC risk several years pre-diagnosis. Assay throughput and specificity are critical to effectively implement a population-level screening program. Here, we developed a strip test assay - EBNA1 SeroStrip-HT - with an objective to increase throughput and maximize specificity. Experimental DesignEBNA1 full-length (FL) and glycine-alanine repeat deletion mutants (dGAr) were purified from insect and mammalian cells to screen serum IgA/IgG from prospective cohorts in Singapore and Shanghai, China, with known time intervals to NPC diagnosis. Twenty pre-diagnostic sera within 4 years to diagnosis were compared to 96 healthy controls using a nested case-control study design. ResultsIgA to mammalian-derived EBNA1 dGAr achieved 85.0% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity (AUC, 0.939) for NPC status. IgA to insect-derived EBNA1 dGAr showed the same sensitivity (85.0%) and similar specificity (93.8%) (AUC, 0.941). IgA to insect-derived EBNA1 FL had a higher 90% sensitivity, but lower 91.7% specificity (AUC, 0.940). Combining EBNA1 FL and dGAr results showed that subjects positive for both proteins had a 243.67 odds ratio for NPC incidence compared to double-negative scores. ConclusionThis study demonstrated the efficacy of EBNA1 SeroStrip-HT for NPC risk assessment and stratification in high- and intermediate-risk populations, yielding high accuracy and a 12-fold increased throughput over the prototype. The insect system was appropriate for large-scale production of purified EBNA1. Larger, geographically diverse cohorts are warranted to confirm these results, especially in low-incidence populations.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.