Back

A high-throughput Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) serology test strip for nasopharyngeal carcinoma risk screening

Warner, B. E.; Patel, J.; Satterwhite, R.; Wang, R.; Adams-Haduch, J.; Koh, W.-P.; Yuan, J.-M.; Shair, K. H. Y.

2026-04-13 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.04.08.26350329 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeAntibodies to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) proteins can predict nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) risk. We previously defined a prototype EBNA1 protein panel and multiplex immunoblot assay that distinguishes NPC risk several years pre-diagnosis. Assay throughput and specificity are critical to effectively implement a population-level screening program. Here, we developed a strip test assay - EBNA1 SeroStrip-HT - with an objective to increase throughput and maximize specificity. Experimental DesignEBNA1 full-length (FL) and glycine-alanine repeat deletion mutants (dGAr) were purified from insect and mammalian cells to screen serum IgA/IgG from prospective cohorts in Singapore and Shanghai, China, with known time intervals to NPC diagnosis. Twenty pre-diagnostic sera within 4 years to diagnosis were compared to 96 healthy controls using a nested case-control study design. ResultsIgA to mammalian-derived EBNA1 dGAr achieved 85.0% sensitivity and 94.8% specificity (AUC, 0.939) for NPC status. IgA to insect-derived EBNA1 dGAr showed the same sensitivity (85.0%) and similar specificity (93.8%) (AUC, 0.941). IgA to insect-derived EBNA1 FL had a higher 90% sensitivity, but lower 91.7% specificity (AUC, 0.940). Combining EBNA1 FL and dGAr results showed that subjects positive for both proteins had a 243.67 odds ratio for NPC incidence compared to double-negative scores. ConclusionThis study demonstrated the efficacy of EBNA1 SeroStrip-HT for NPC risk assessment and stratification in high- and intermediate-risk populations, yielding high accuracy and a 12-fold increased throughput over the prototype. The insect system was appropriate for large-scale production of purified EBNA1. Larger, geographically diverse cohorts are warranted to confirm these results, especially in low-incidence populations.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
6
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
14
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
23
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
24
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
27
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
29
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%