Nationwide Prediction of Missed and Cancelled Appointments Using Real-World EHR Data
Miran, S. A.; Cheng, Y.; Faselis, C.; Brandt, C.; Vasaitis, S.; Nesbitt, L.; Zanin, L.; Tekle, S.; Ahmed, A.; Nelson, S. J.; Zeng-Treitler, Q.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo develop and evaluate predictive models for unused outpatient appointments (missed or cancelled) using a large national electronic health record (EHR) repository in the United States. DesignRetrospective observational study using machine learning and statistical modeling. SettingA U.S. national electronic health record repository (Cerner Real World Database) covering healthcare encounters from 2010 to 2025. ParticipantsAdult patients aged [≥]18 years with routine outpatient encounters recorded in the database. One outpatient appointment with a known status was randomly selected per patient, resulting in a final analytic sample of 5,699,861 encounters. Primary and Secondary Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was whether the index outpatient appointment was attended or unused (missed or cancelled). Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. MethodsPredictors included patient characteristics (demographics and insurance type), appointment characteristics (day, time, season, and urbanicity), prior cancellation rate, and time gap between the index appointment and the previous visit. We compared the predictive performance of two machine learning models (random forest classifier and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) with logistic regression. An explainable AI analysis of feature impact was performed on the final XGBoost model. ResultsAmong 5,699,861 outpatient encounters, 3,650,715 (64.0%) were attended and 2,049,146 (36.0%) were unused. XGBoost achieved the best predictive performance on the test dataset (AUC = 0.95), followed by random forest (AUC = 0.92) and logistic regression (AUC = 0.89). Feature impact score analysis revealed highly non-linear associations between predictors and the risk of unused appointments at the individual level. ConclusionsUnused outpatient appointments can be accurately predicted using routinely available EHR data. Integrating predictive models into scheduling workflows may improve healthcare efficiency and optimize appointment management. Article SummaryStrengths and limitations of this study O_LIThis study used one of the largest national electronic health record datasets to develop predictive models for unused outpatient appointments. C_LIO_LIMultiple modeling approaches, including logistic regression and machine learning methods (random forest and XGBoost), were compared to evaluate predictive performance. C_LIO_LIAn explainable artificial intelligence method was applied to quantify feature impact and improve model interpretability. C_LIO_LIThe retrospective design and reliance on routinely collected EHR data may introduce data quality limitations and unmeasured confounding. C_LIO_LIThe database did not distinguish clearly between cancelled appointments and no-shows. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of preferred language data in a multi-hospital electronic health record in Toronto, Canada 92%
- A proposed de-identification framework for a cohort of children presenting at a health facility in Uganda 92%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Directed Interventions Associate with Decreased Hospitalization Rates in Hemodialysis Patients 93%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 93%
- Completion of electronic nursing documentation of inpatient admission assessment: insights from Australian metropolitan hospitals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 93%
- Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National Retrospective EHR Study 93%
- COHD-COVID: Columbia Open Health Data for COVID-19 Research 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 93%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 93%
- Machine learning to predict retention and viral suppression in South African HIV treatment cohorts 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.