Back

Ecology of metagenomes: incorporating genotype-to-phenotype maps into ecological models

Liu, S.; Mehta, P.

2026-04-10 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.07.717079 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A major theoretical problem in community ecology is to understand how genes, organisms, and environments combine to shape the structure and diversity of ecological communities. However, most classic ecological models work entirely with phenotypic parameters, neglecting the central role played by genes. This limitation is particularly acute in microbial ecology, where the widespread use of sequencing technologies allows researchers to directly measure the genomic and metagenomic properties of communities. Here, we bridge this gap by incorporating genotype-to-phenotype maps into classical ecological models, including the generalized Lotka-Volterra model (GLV) and consumer resource models (CRMs). We focus on the case where genotype-to-phenotype maps are linear, which provides a tractable yet powerful framework for analyzing complex traits. Even in this simple setting, the resulting ecological dynamics give rise to novel gene-level ecological dynamics that can be recast entirely in terms of genes, allowing us to develop an ecology of metagenomes. We find that ecological interactions between genes lead to pervasive "metagenomic hitchhiking" -- low-fitness genes can survive in the ecosystem because they are integrated into genomes of high-fitness species. We also show that phylogenetic relationships between species mold the ability of closely related strains to stably coexist in complex communities. This highlights how lineage structure and competitive interactions jointly shape community composition. Our framework provides a principled foundation for interpreting metagenomic data through the lens of ecological theory. Author summaryRecent advances in sequencing technologies have transformed our ability to characterize microbial communities at the genomic level. However, most classic ecological models work entirely with phenotypic parameters, neglecting the central role played by genes. Here, we address this gap by extending classical ecological models to explicitly include genotype-to-phenotype maps. We focus on complex traits where the genotype-to-phenotype map is approximately linear. We show that the resulting ecological dynamics that can be recast entirely in terms of genes, allowing us to develop an ecology of metagenomes. Our framework provides a novel perspective for interpreting metagenomic data through the lens of ecological theory.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
22.4%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.5%
3
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.8%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.1%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.7%
7
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.6%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.9%
11
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.9%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
18
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
21
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%