Back

Multi-region biopsies and patient-derived neurosphere cultures reveal spatial divergence in glioblastoma.

Salatino, R.; Geisberg, J.; Romero-Toledo, A.; Oakes, B.; Nwachukwu, J. C.; Hwang, D.; Vincentelli, C.; Szentirmai, O.; McDonald, T. O.; Nettles, K. W.; Michor, F.; Janiszewska, M.

2026-04-10 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.07.717044 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) is one of the main reasons for the lack of effective targeted therapies for glioblastoma (GBM). Imaging-guided surgical navigation allows for tumor-wide sampling to account for variation across distant regions of the tumor, but typical drug screening is performed on cell lines derived from a single biopsy and does not account for GBM heterogeneity. Here we profiled matching MRI-guided multi-region primary tumor biopsies from 6 GBM cases (n=40 biopsies) and corresponding neurosphere cultures (n=30) derived from these spatially distinct tumor samples. We found that in vitro cultures derived from distinct regions of the same tumor display divergent phenotypes, proliferative capacity and ability to accumulate 5-aminolevulinic acid, used to visualize cancer cells during surgery. The differential drug response of the multi-region neurospheres remains linked to the gene expression of the original tumor biopsies. Thus, studies with multiregion-derived neurospheres are essential to faithfully model GBM ITH for therapeutic testing. KEY POINTSO_LIMulti-region biopsy-derived neurospheres represent distinct spatial locations in the GBM tumor. C_LIO_LICultures derived from different regions of the tumor retain phenotypic diversity. C_LIO_LIParental biopsy phenotype predicts drug response better than to in vitro phenotype. C_LI IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDYCell lines developed from spatially distinct regions of glioblastoma capture its intratumor heterogeneity. We show that while the transcriptional output of these cell lines is not connected to their spatial origin, their drug response can be linked to it. Thus, spatial heterogeneity reflected in our neurosphere collection provides a new paradigm for drug screening in these highly heterogenous and difficult to treat tumors.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.4%
3
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.6%
5
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
6
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
8
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.0%
12
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
13
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.2%
15
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
17
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.3%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
20
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
22
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
24
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
29
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
30
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%