Back

Iterative delay correction improves breath-hold cerebrovascular reactivity mapping in clinical populations

Clements, R. G.; Geranmayeh, F.; Parkinson, N. V.; Bright, M. G.

2026-04-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.07.716988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR), the ability of cerebral blood vessels to dilate or constrict in response to a vasoactive stimulus, is an important measure of cerebrovascular health. Accurate CVR estimation requires accounting for the time required for the vasoactive stimulus to reach each brain region and the time it takes for local arterioles to modulate cerebral blood flow. The temporal search range used to calculate this spatially varying offset can substantially impact CVR estimates, and the appropriate search range may vary across populations, acquisition protocols, and even brain regions. Here, we present an iterative approach for automatically determining the appropriate maximum shift, using breath-hold fMRI data acquired in a cohort of stroke survivors. This approach selectively expands the delay search range only for voxels with estimated delays at the boundary (i.e., near the minimum or maximum shift) until the estimated delay is no longer constrained or a predefined value is reached. In the context of stroke, this approach significantly increased the number of voxels with statistically significant CVR among those initially at the boundary. It also resulted in CVR polarity reversals in voxels originally at the early-response boundary and amplified negative CVR values in voxels originally at the late-response boundary, suggesting that using an iterative maximum shift can critically impact CVR interpretation. This approach is broadly applicable beyond stroke, but careful parameter tuning is required, as illustrated by our demonstration of the parameter tuning process for a participant with Moyamoya disease. Together, these findings suggest that iterative delay correction allows for improved CVR assessments in clinical populations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
18.4%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
3
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.2%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
12
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
17
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
22
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%