Back

Tell your friends: communication through autoattractants can enhance and limit migration of immune cells

Versluis, D. M.; Insall, R. H.

2026-04-08 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.07.716888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many eukaryotic cells produce attractant molecules to which they themselves are also attracted. For example, neutrophils produce leukotriene B4 while swarming. These autoattractants create a secondary signalling layer that can coordinate collective cell behaviour during chemotaxis. Here we use a hybrid agent-based computational model to examine how immune cells migrating along a self-generated gradient may communicate with each other using autoattractants. We find that autoattractant signals strongly enhance cells responses to primary attractant. Efficient removal of autoattractants is also crucial, through depletion by cells, chemical instability, or enzymatic breakdown. Consequently, autoattractants have a lifetime, determined by a balance between production and removal rates. We find that optimal lifetimes exist, and that these are determined by cell speed and attractant diffusion, but are remarkably independent of cell density and primary attractant concentration. We further show that autoattractants whose removal is governed by inherent instability rather than breakdown by cells coordinate migration less efficiently, but work more robustly across different environments. Finally, we find that autoattractant signalling without direct breakdown by the cells involved establishes a characteristic optimal cell-cell distance: too little communication leaves cells uncoordinated, while excessive communication causes cells to aggregate into slow-moving clumps. Strikingly, the conditions that produce optimal chemotaxis lie very close to those that trigger aggregation, suggesting that many autoattractant systems operate near a critical boundary.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.4%
2
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.0%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
7
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.7%
11
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
15
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
17
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
21
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
24
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%