Back

Expression profile of CASSIOPEIA patients refines prognostic value of MRD negativity in multiple myeloma

Magrangeas, F.; Guerin-Charbonnel, C.; Bessonneau-Gaborit, V.; Denoulet, M.; Giordano, N.; Perrot, A.; Touzeau, C.; van Duin, M.; Douillard, E.; Devic, M.; Letouze, E.; Sonneveld, P.; Corre, J.; Minvielle, S.; Moreau, P.

2026-04-09 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.04.07.716874 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Long-term follow-up of the CASSIOPEIA trial (NCT02541383) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with daratumumab, both in combination with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone during induction and consolidation, and during maintenance therapy, in transplant- eligible patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma (MM). However, outcomes among CASSIOPEIA patients remain heterogeneous across treatment groups. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a strong indicator of the depth and duration of therapeutic response and is independently associated with both PFS and overall survival (OS), but it does not fully capture the biological diversity of MM. We performed a risk prediction analysis based on transcriptomic subgroups in CASSIOPEIA patients. A subset of 628 patients was characterized using RNA sequencing and consensus clustering identified five transcriptomic subtypes of MM. Long-term follow-up allowed the definition of three transcriptomic risk categories, with estimated 72-month PFS rates of 70%, 51%, and 27% for low, intermediate, and high-risk groups, respectively, among patients who received daratumumab in at least one treatment phase. In these patients, MRD negativity rates after consolidation and six months later were significantly higher in the low and high-risk groups compared with the intermediate-risk group. In the high-risk group, MRD status was not associated with PFS or OS. This suggests that, although daratumumab administered during both the induction/consolidation and maintenance phases improves the clinical outcomes of patients with activation of NSD2 or overexpressing members of the MAF family, highly aggressive minor clones may rapidly expand. These findings emphasize the need for novel therapeutic strategies in this high-risk population.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
5
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
7
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
12
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
17
Journal of Hematology & Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
25
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
28
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%