Back

Serial femtosecond crystallography reveals the pH-driven allosteric mechanism of hexamer glargine

AYAN, E.; Shankar, M. K.; Telek, E.; Kang, J.; Fintor, K.; Yabuuchi, T.; Yabashi, M.; Tosha, T.

2026-04-10 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.07.716775 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Insulin glargine is formulated at acidic pH but acts after transferring to near-neutral tissue, where its prolonged effect is commonly attributed to isoelectric depot formation. However, the structural pathway linking precipitation to delayed release has remained unresolved. Here we combine ambient-temperature serial femtosecond crystallography, solution biophysics, and multiscale network analyses to define the pH-dependent conformational landscape of hexameric glargine across pH 8.4, 7.3, 6.4, and 5.1. We resolve full hexameric glargine structures and identify a previously unreported, pH-coupled lattice transition from P1211 (near-neutral) to R3:H (acidic), accompanied by redistribution from compact phenolic Rf6-state assemblies to more plastic yet structurally coherent TRf/T3Rf3 states. This transition is accompanied by B-chain N-terminal unpeeling, phenol-pocket collapse, hydration loss, and electrostatic rewiring, and is mirrored in solution by oligomeric heterogeneity, Raman amide-I broadening, reduced thermal stability, and a blue-shifted intrinsic fluorescence maximum. Multiscale analyses further indicate that acidification does not create a new dynamical regime but reweighs pre-existing collective modes along a continuous free-energy landscape. These results support a revised mechanism in which isoelectric precipitation and delayed dissociation are mechanistically coupled through structurally organized molten-like intermediate states, linking glargine pharmacology to intrinsic allosteric redistribution within the hexamer. These findings establish a structural blueprint for benchmarking biosimilar glargine and for engineering next-generation basal insulins by tuning allosteric plasticity and intermediate-state stability.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 6%
18.5%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
3
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
4
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.3%
5
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
8
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
9
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
10
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
11
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
13
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
16
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
17
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
19
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.1%
21
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
24
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%