Back

Cell-specific variant-to-gene mapping identifies conserved neural and glial regulators of sleep

Zimmerman, A. J.; Biglari, S.; Trang, K. B.; Almeraya Del Valle, E.; Pack, A. I.; Grant, S. F.; Keene, A. C.

2026-04-09 genetics
10.64898/2026.04.07.715910 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a heterogeneous phenotype with little known of its genetic basis. Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have reported genomic loci associated with EDS, though since most of these are non-coding, the causal gene(s) underlying the association are not known. Additionally, the cell types in which these genes exert their effects on sleep have not been functionally explored in vivo. Here, we employed a chromatin-based variant-to-gene mapping approach to first implicate candidate effector genes at EDS GWAS loci in human-derived neural and glial cell lines. Subsequent cell type-specific RNAi knockdown of orthologous genes using neural and glial GAL4 drivers in Drosophila confirmed cell-specific regulation of sleep by these GWAS-implicated effector genes. Among these, ruby (ortholog to AP3B2), a component of the AP-3 vesicular trafficking complex emerged as a robust sleep regulator. Targeted knockdown in flies localized ruby function to astrocyte-like glia, where loss of ruby increased sleep duration. The conserved role of ruby/ ap3b2 was validated in zebrafish where CRISPR-mediated loss increased daytime sleep. Together, these findings show that physical variant-to-gene mapping predicted cell-type-specific gene function for complex sleep traits and revealed ruby/AP3B2 as a conserved glial regulator of sleep and arousal. This work provides a generalizable framework for connecting non-coding GWAS variants and their corresponding effector genes to identify novel and highly conserved regulators of sleep.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
4
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
5
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 10%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
8
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.3%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
11
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
19
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
26
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
27
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%