Back

Sympathetic Innervation Modulates Ventricular Repolarization and Arrhythmia Vulnerability After Myocardial Infarction

Villar-Valero, J.; Nebot, L.; Soto-Iglesias, D.; Falasconi, G.; Berruezo, A.; Boukens, B. J. D.; Trenor, B.; Gomez, J. F.

2026-04-11 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350356 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSympathetic modulation via the stellate ganglia is increasingly recognized as a contributor to ventricular arrhythmogenesis after myocardial infarction. However, the mechanisms by which autonomic remodeling interacts with chronic infarct substrates to shape arrhythmic vulnerability remain incompletely understood. ObjectivesTo test the hypothesis that left- and right-sided stellate ganglion-mediated SNS modulation differentially reshapes ventricular arrhythmic vulnerability in chronic post-infarcted substrates, and that the RVI detects changes in vulnerability beyond conventional stimulation-based inducibility. MethodsFourteen patient-specific ventricular models with chronic post-infarcted remodeling were reconstructed from imaging data. A total of 336 simulations were performed under different combinations of stellate ganglion modulation, border zone remodeling, and fibroblast density. Arrhythmic vulnerability was quantified using 3D RVI mapping during paced rhythms and compared with conventional stimulation-based inducibility outcomes. ResultsStellate ganglion modulation induced marked, regionally heterogeneous changes in repolarization timing, resulting in lower and more negative RVI values in vulnerable regions. More negative RVI values reflect increased propensity for wavefront-waveback interaction and reentry initiation. Across the cohort, stellate modulation consistently decreased RVImin, even when inducibility outcomes remained unchanged. These findings indicate that SNS modulation can create a substrate more permissive to reentry independently of whether ventricular arrhythmia is triggered during programmed stimulation. ConclusionsStellate ganglion-mediated sympathetic modulation dynamically reshapes ventricular arrhythmic vulnerability in chronic post-infarcted substrates. RVI provides a spatially resolved, vulnerability-based metric that complements inducibility testing by revealing autonomic-substrate interactions underlying arrhythmogenesis Condensed AbstractSympathetic modulation via the stellate ganglia can alter ventricular repolarization and promote arrhythmogenesis after myocardial infarction, yet clinical responses remain heterogeneous. Using 14 patient-specific post-infarction ventricular models, we simulated left- and right-sided stellate modulation across combinations of border zone remodeling and fibrosis (336 simulations). Stellate modulation induced regionally heterogeneous repolarization shortening and reduced RVI values, even when programmed stimulation inducibility remained unchanged. These findings suggest that RVI captures substrate-level vulnerability beyond binary induction testing and may improve mechanistic assessment of autonomic-substrate interactions in chronic infarct substrates.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.7%
2
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
3
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.2%
7
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
8
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.0%
13
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
23
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%