Back

AI Implementation in Safety Net Healthcare: Understanding Barriers and Strategies

Thomas, C.; Kim, J. Y.; Hasan, A.; Kpodzro, S.; Cortes, J.; Day, B.; Jensen, S.; LHuillier, S.; Oden, M. O.; Zumbado Segura, S.; Maurer, E. W.; Tucker, S.; Robinson, S.; Garcia, B.; Muramalla, E.; Lu, S.; Chawla, N.; Patel, M.; Balu, S.; Sendak, M.

2026-04-11 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350351 medRxiv
Show abstract

Safety net healthcare delivery organizations (SNOs) serve vulnerable populations but face persistent challenges in adopting new technologies, including AI. While systematic barriers to technology adoption in SNOs are well documented, little is known about how AI is implemented in these settings. This study explored real-world AI adoption in SNOs, focusing on identifying barriers encountered across the AI lifecycle and strategies used to overcome them. Five SNOs in the U.S. participated in a 12-month technical assistance program, the Practice Network, to implement AI tools of their choosing. Observed barriers and mitigation strategies were documented throughout program activities and, at the conclusion of the program, reviewed and refined with participants using a participatory research approach to ensure findings reflected lived experiences and organizational contexts. Key barriers emerged during the Integration and Lifecycle Management phases and included gaps in AI performance evaluation and impact assessments, communication with patients about AI use, foundational AI education, financial resources for purchasing and maintaining AI tools, and AI governance structures. Effective strategies for addressing these barriers were primarily supported through centralized expertise, structured guidance, and peer learning. These findings provide granular, actionable insights for SNO leaders, offering guidance for anticipating barriers and proactively planning mitigation strategies. By including SNO perspectives, the study also contributes to the broader health AI ecosystem and underscores the importance of participatory, collaborative approaches to support safe, effective, and ethical AI adoption in resource-constrained settings. Author SummarySafety net organizations (SNOs) are healthcare systems that primarily serve low-income and underinsured patients. While interest in artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has grown rapidly, little is known about how these organizations experience AI adoption in practice. In this study, we partnered with five SNOs over a 12-month program to document the challenges they encountered when implementing AI tools and the strategies they used to address them. We worked closely with SNO staff throughout the process to ensure our findings reflected their lived experiences with AI implementation. We found that the most common challenges arose when organizations tried to integrate AI into daily operations and monitor and maintain those tools over time. Specific barriers included difficulty evaluating whether AI was performing as expected, limited guidance on communicating with patients about AI use, a lack of resources for staff training, limited financial resources, and the absence of formal governance structures. Successful strategies for overcoming these challenges drew on shared knowledge and structured support provided by the program, as well as learning from peer organizations. These findings offer practical guidance for SNO leaders planning or managing AI adoption, and contribute to a broader conversation about what is required to implement AI safely and effectively in healthcare settings that serve the most medically and socially vulnerable patients.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.3%
2
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
4
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
20
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%