Causal estimands and target trials for the effect of lag time to treatment of cancer patients
Goncalves, B. P.; Franco, E. L.
Show abstract
Timeliness of therapy initiation is a fundamental determinant of outcomes for many medical conditions, most importantly, cancer. Yet, existing inefficiencies in healthcare systems mean that delays between diagnosis and treatment frequently adversely affect the clinical outcome for cancer patients. Although estimates of effects of lag time to therapy would be informative to policymakers considering resource allocation to minimize delays in oncology, causal methods are seldom explicitly discussed in epidemiologic analyses of these lag times. Here, we propose causal estimands for such studies, and outline the protocol of a target trial that could be emulated with observational data on lag times. To illustrate the application of this approach, we simulate studies of lag time to treatment under two scenarios: one in which indication bias (Waiting Time Paradox) is present and another in which it is absent. Although our discussion focuses on oncologic outcomes, components of the proposed target trial could be adapted to study delays for other medical conditions. We believe that the clarity with which causal questions are posed under the target trial emulation framework would lead to improved quantification of the effects of lag times in oncology, and hence to better informed policy decisions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Potential Biases in Test-Negative Design Studies of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Arising from the Inclusion of Asymptomatic Individuals 94%
- Estimating protection afforded by prior infection in preventing reinfection: Applying the test-negative study design 91%
- Potential biases arising from epidemic dynamics in observational seroprotection studies 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-state network meta-analysis of cause-specific survival data 94%
- A Double Machine Learning Approach for the Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness under the Test-Negative Design: Analysis of Québec Administrative Data 94%
- Sensitivity to missing not at random dropout in clinical trials: use and interpretation of the Trimmed Means Estimator 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal Estimands for Infectious Disease Count Outcomes to Investigate the Public Health Impact of Interventions 93%
- Estimating vaccine efficacy against transmission via effect on viral load 93%
- Use of recently vaccinated individuals to detect bias in test-negative case-control studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Income inequality and access to advanced immunotherapy for lung cancer: the case of Durvalumab in the Netherlands 91%
- Estimating and Testing an Index of Bias Attributable to Composite Outcomes in Comparative Studies 91%
- Information bias of vaccine effectiveness estimation due to informed consent for national registration of COVID-19 vaccination: estimation and correction using a data augmentation model 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.