Back

Optimization Of Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis In Oncourology: The Role Of A Clinical Pharmacologist And Assessment Of Clinical And Economic Outcomes

Dovlatbekyan, N. M.; Ochakovskaya, I. N.; Penjoyan, A. G.; Durleshter, V. M.; Onopriev, V. V.; Avagimov, A. D.

2026-04-08 urology
10.64898/2026.04.07.26350335 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of a bundle of interventions involving a clinical pharmacologist aimed at changing surgeons approach to perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in an oncourology department. Materials and Methods. A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted. Data from 226 patients who underwent prostatectomy or nephrectomy in the oncourology department of Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2 (Krasnodar, Russia) between 2023 and 2025 were analyzed. Periods before (n=125) and after (n=101) the implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) strategy bundle with active participation of a clinical pharmacologist (pre-authorization, audit with feedback, education, handshake stewardship) were compared. The primary endpoint was the proportion of surgeries performed in compliance with the PAP protocol. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of infectious complications, antibiotic consumption (DDD/100 bed-days), direct costs of antibacterial drugs, dynamics of the microbial landscape, and the Drug Resistance Index (DRI). Results. After AMS implementation, the proportion of surgeries performed in accordance with the PAP protocol increased from 0% to 47.7% for prostatectomies and to 55.6% for nephrectomies. The mean duration of antibiotic use decreased from 7 to 2 days (p<0.001). Antibiotic consumption decreased by 31.2%, and costs were reduced by a factor of 4.3. The proportion of ESKAPE organisms in the microbial profile decreased from 26.3% to 16.4%. There was no statistically significant increase in the frequency of infectious complications (2.4% vs. 3.0%; p=1.000) or mortality (0% in both groups). Conclusions. AMS implementation integrating a clinical pharmacologist into the oncourology department workflow significantly improved adherence to clinical guidelines, reduced irrational antibiotic use and financial costs without compromising patient safety. This approach can serve as a model for optimizing PAP in other surgical departments. Keywords: antibiotic prophylaxis, antimicrobial stewardship, drug resistance, clinical pharmacologist, cost-benefit analysis, oncourology

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
5
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
11
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
19
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
26
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%