Back

Automated echocardiographic measurements for longitudinal monitoring of ATTR cardiomyopathy: agreement and repeatability analysis

Walser, A.; Clerc, O. F.; Mork, C.; Flammer, A. J.; Myhre, P. L.; Schwotzer, R.; Graeni, C.; Ruschitzka, F.; Tanner, F. C.; Benz, D. C.

2026-04-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.04.07.26349280 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Detection of disease progression is key to personalize treatment strategies in transthyretin cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), particularly with emerging therapies. Echocardiography can detect subtle longitudinal changes but is limited by operator dependence. This study evaluates agreement and reproducibility of fully automated, AI-assisted echocardiographic measurements under real-world conditions. Methods: This retrospective study included 62 patients with ATTR-CM undergoing 178 serial annual echocardiograms assessed by a reference cardiologist, a second cardiologist, a novice reader, and a fully automated AI algorithm (Us2.ai). Interrater agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Intrarater variability for human readers was derived from repeated blinded measurements, with limits of agreement (LoA = mean difference +/- 1.96 x SD) defining the smallest detectable change. AI repeatability was assessed using within-study pairwise differences. Results: AI showed moderate agreement with the reference cardiologist for IVSd and LVEDV (ICC 0.65 and 0.51), with biases of -1.9 mm and -39 mL, respectively. Interrater agreement between cardiologists was good (ICC 0.79 and 0.84) with minimal bias (-0.2 mm and +3 mL). Intrarater variability was moderate to excellent for both cardiologists (LoA 3.0 mm and 43 mL for the reference cardiologist; 2.7 mm and 31 mL for the second cardiologist). AI demonstrated comparable repeatability (LoA 3.6 mm and 37 mL), while the novice showed higher variability (5.1 mm and 61 mL). Conclusion: AI-based measurements demonstrated repeatability comparable to experienced cardiologists. Despite moderate agreement and systematic differences in volumetric assessments, their reproducibility supports automated analysis for longitudinal echocardiographic monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.