Agentic systems are adept at solving well-scoped, verifiable problems in computational biology

We introduce CompBioBench, a benchmark of 100 diverse tasks for evaluating agentic systems in computational biology. Unlike mathematics and programming, which more readily admit systematic verification, biological data are inherently noisy and open to interpretation. To enable objective evaluation without reducing tasks to prescriptive checklists, we propose a new benchmark construction strategy based on synthetic/augmented data and metadata scrambling/scrubbing of real datasets to create challenging problems with a single ground-truth answer that require multi-step reasoning, tool use, bespoke code, and interaction with real-world external resources. The benchmark spans genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics, single-cell analysis, human genetics, and machine learning workflows. Questions are curated by domain experts to cover a broad range of skills with varying difficulty. We evaluate leading general-purpose agentic systems starting from a bare-minimum environment, requiring them to fetch data and tools as needed to solve each problem. We find strong end-to-end performance, with Codex CLI (GPT 5.4) reaching 83% accuracy and Claude Code (Opus 4.6) reaching 81%. On the hardest questions, Codex CLI (GPT 5.4) reaches 59%, while Claude Code (Opus 4.6) reaches 69%. CompBioBench provides a practical testbed for measuring the progress of agentic systems in computational biology and for guiding future benchmark design.