Back

A Nonlinear Biomechanical Model for Prognostic Analysis of Clavicle Fractures

Chen, Y.

2026-04-09 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.04.06.716697 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clavicle fractures often exhibit markedly different clinical outcomes: some patients recover acceptable function despite shortening or displacement, whereas others with apparently similar deformity develop persistent pain, functional loss, or poor healing. To explain this distinction, we propose a minimal nonlinear mechanical model for prognostic analysis of clavicle fractures. The model describes the interaction between fracture-related shortening and compensatory shoulder-girdle posture through a reduced equilibrium equation incorporating stiffness, geometric nonlinearity, and shortening-posture coupling. Within this framework, we analyze equilibrium branches, local stability, and the emergence of critical thresholds. We show that post-fracture destabilization can be interpreted as a fold bifurcation, while more complex parameter dependence gives rise to cusp-type structures and multistability. These bifurcation mechanisms provide a mathematical explanation for sudden deterioration after injury or treatment, as well as for strong inter-individual variability. We further introduce an optimization principle based on a utility functional to guide treatment planning. The analysis predicts that the optimal safe correction should lie strictly below the bifurcation threshold, thereby generating a natural safety margin. Although the model is simplified and has not yet been calibrated against patient data, it nevertheless provides a theoretical framework for understanding why fracture prognosis may deteriorate abruptly near critical mechanical conditions and offers a dynamical-systems interpretation of empirical treatment thresholds used in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.4%
4
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.8%
6
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
10
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
14
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
18
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
20
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
25
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
29
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%