Back

Drosophila pseudoobscura third chromosome inversion arrangements have sex-specific effects on life history traits

Reyes Castellon, G. A.; Aimadeddine, G.; Chiao, C. R.; Guruprasad, S.; Halbert, P. E.; Hassan, S. A.; Luong, M. Q.; Mailanperuma Arachchillage, K. S.; Martinez, Y.; Mukhtarov, M.; Nair, G.; Nguyen, E. N.; Onochie, C. L.; Patel, O.; Than, J. T.; Manat, Y.; IISAGE, ; Meisel, R. P.

2026-04-08 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.04.06.716560 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Life history traits are often correlated, creating trade-offs that may impede the response to natural selection and be responsible for the evolution of senescence. These trade-offs may arise through pleiotropic effects, which can affect the response to selection in ways that resemble intra-locus sexual antagonism. Despite these hypothesized relationships, we lack clear connections between pleiotropy, sexual antagonism, and the evolution of life histories. Empirical tests for inter-sexual differences in life-history traits, including sex-specific aging, can be used to evaluate hypotheses about how pleiotropy and sexual conflict affect evolutionary trade-offs. To those ends, we measured lifespan, development time, and body size in Drosophila pseudoobscura males and females, each of which carried one of six third chromosome inversion genotypes. Temperature affected lifespan and development more than any other factor; higher temperatures increased mortality rate, decreased lifespan, and accelerated development. However, we also observed sex differences in mortality rates and development times that depended on genotype and temperature. Notably, temperature elevated the initial mortality rate across all flies, yet increasing temperatures reduced the rate of aging in some genotype-sex combinations. Similarly, direct effects of genotype on mortality rate and development time depended greatly on sex and temperature, but there was no genotype effect on body size. Despite these context-dependent genotype effects on life history traits, we failed to identify any correlations that would serve as clear evidence for sexual conflict or trade-offs. Our results therefore suggest that either historical conflicts have been resolved or any conflicts that may exist do not result in the correlations predicted by existing models.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.3%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
3
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
4
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
9
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
12
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
15
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
18
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
19
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
20
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
22
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
28
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
29
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%