Back

Physical activity and body mass index inequities among adult women in the United States: An application of intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (I-MAIHDA)

Echeverria, S.; Seo, Y.; Borrell, L. N.; McKelvey, D.; Najjar, T.; Reifsteck, E. J.; Erausquin, J. T.; Maher, J. P.

2026-04-07 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.04.06.26350273 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Physical activity (PA) and body mass index (BMI) shape cardiovascular risk, particularly in women. Yet, little research exists examining intersectional social axes shaping PA and BMI inequities among women living in the United States (US). Methods Data included women sampled in the 2015-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. We used Intersectional Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (I-MAIHDA) via linear models to examine PA (n=,4591) and BMI (n=4,596) inequities across intersectional strata defined by race/ethnicity, age, education, nativity, and work status. We further quantified the contribution of these strata to the observed inequities and estimated additive fixed effects. Results In the null model, intersectional strata explained 4.6% and 13.8% of the variance in PA and BMI inequities, respectively, with 99.2% for PA and 97.5% for BMI explained by age, race/ethnicity, education, nativity, and occupation status. On average, Asian and Black women, those aged 35-49 years, those born outside the US, and those with less than a high school diploma had the lowest predicted mean PA. For BMI, Black and Hispanic/Latino women and those younger than 64 years had the highest mean BMI. Conclusion PA and BMI inequities are mostly explained by race/ethnicity, age, education, nativity, and work status. Our findings offer insights into universal and potential policy-informed health promotion strategies that may be tailored to women with these social identities and lived experiences that have shaped physical activity and body mass index inequities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
8
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
23
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
27
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%