Clinician-Informed Feature Engineering Improves Machine Learning Assignment of Molecular Endotypes in the Intensive Care Unit
Sines, B. J.; Hagan, R. S.; Jiang, X.; Pavlechko, E.; McClain, S.; Hunt, X.; Florou-Moreno, J.; Acquardo, J.; Risa, G.; Valsaraj, V.; Schisler, J. C.; Wolfgang, M. C.
Show abstract
Objective: To develop a workflow that transforms electronic health record data into machine learning-ready features for molecular endotype assignment and to evaluate whether clinician-informed feature engineering improves model performance and interpretability. Materials and Methods: We developed parallel clinician-informed and clinician-agnostic feature engineering pipelines to prepare raw EHR data from mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure. Molecular endotype labels derived from paired deep lung and blood profiling of subjects with acute lung injury were used to train candidate machine learning classifiers. Champion models from each pipeline were compared on predefined performance metrics. Results: Bayesian network classifiers were the top-performing models in both pipelines. The clinician-informed pipeline generated fewer features than the clinician-agnostic pipeline (645 vs 1,127) and produced a lower misclassification rate in the final Bayesian network model (0.047 vs 0.14). In an independent cohort of subjects with acute lung injury, the clinician-informed model better distinguished corticosteroid-responsive from non-responsive subgroups. Discussion: Clinical context improved feature engineering efficiency, model interpretability, and classification performance. These findings support the integration of domain expertise into machine learning workflows intended for critical care implementation. Conclusions: Clinician-informed feature engineering can simplify machine learning models while improving performance and preserving clinical relevance. AI tools developed for healthcare should incorporate subject matter expertise early in the feature engineering and analytic workflow.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 95%
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 95%
- Personalizing renal replacement therapy initiation in the intensive care unit: a reinforcement learning-based strategy with external validation on the AKIKI randomized controlled trials 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive ML-based Respiratory Monitoring System for Physiological Monitoring & Resource Planning in the ICU 95%
- Machine Learning Generalizability Across Healthcare Settings: Insights from multi-site COVID-19 screening 94%
- Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 94%
- Generalizability Challenges of Mortality Risk Prediction Models: A Retrospective Analysis on a Multi-center Database 94%
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
- A machine learning-based phenotype for long COVID in children: an EHR-based study from the RECOVER program 94%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 96%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 96%
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.