Back

Biologically informed geometry and force distribution improve task performance in agonist/antagonist tendon-driven prosthetic hands

Velasquez, L. I.; Brown, J. D.

2026-04-06 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.04.06.26350199 medRxiv
Show abstract

Prosthetic devices balance functionality and usability to support activities of daily living (ADLs). However, many designs rely on rigid end effectors that, while anthropomorphic in form, lack biomimetic design principles. This mismatch increases cognitive and physical burden, reducing adoption rates. We developed the Human-inspired Actuator Modeling and Reconstruction (HAMR) process, a user-centered framework informed by individual morphology and functional needs, to generate customized agonist/antagonist tendon-actuated end effectors. Using HAMR, we created the Tendon Actuated Prosthetic Hand (TAPH), which integrates human-derived geometry with adaptive force distribution to promote natural object interaction. In a study with 12 participants without limb difference, TAPH was compared to a structurally similar tendon-actuated hand with generalized anthropomorphic geometry across three ADL tasks of varying complexity. TAPH significantly improved task performance and reduced physical effort, mental workload, and frustration, particularly during gross motor tasks. For fine motor tasks, performance improved under stable conditions but not during tasks requiring dynamic precision and continuous coordination. These findings highlight the functional benefits of biologically informed prosthesis design and support biomimetic principles in enhancing performance and user experience.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
6
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
9
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
11
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
18
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%