Back

Strategy Sets the Scene: Genetic architecture of linalool resistance in Botrytis cinerea

Madrigal, M.; Dowell, J. A.; Moseley, J. C.; Kliebenstein, D.

2026-04-08 genomics
10.64898/2026.04.05.716576 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Botrytis cinerea is a necrotrophic fungal pathogen that infects thousands of plant species. During infection, these diverse plant hosts produce different specialized metabolites that can inhibit pathogen growth and shape pathogen fitness. However, the genetic architecture of pathogen resistance toward individual host defense metabolites remains poorly understood. To address this question, we exposed 83 B. cinerea isolates to the metabolite linalool and quantified metabolic and structural responses. Exposure revealed extensive phenotypic diversity across isolates. Genome-wide association identified 101 genes of interest associated with membrane transport and stress response regulation. Genetic associations were stronger for morphological traits than for metabolic traits, suggesting that hyphal architecture may have a complex genetic architecture contributing to linalool resistance. Together, these results establish natural variation in linalool response and provide candidate loci for understanding how generalist pathogens respond to host-derived chemical defenses. Article SummaryTo understand how a generalist pathogen responds to host defenses, we asked how Botrytis cinerea responds to linalool, a widespread monoterpene involved in plant defense. We exposed 83 B. cinerea isolates to 1000 {micro}M of linalool for 72 hours and quantified metabolic traits (growth curves and growth dynamics over time) and morphological traits (hyphal network features). Using GWA, we linked phenotypic variation to genetic variants. Results indicate substantial natural variation in linalool resistance and distinct genetic architectures across trait classes: metabolic responses are driven by a relatively small number of loci with larger effects, whereas structural/morphological responses appear more polygenic.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
2
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
3
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.1%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
6
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.5%
8
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
10
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
11
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
12
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.7%
13
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
16
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.6%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.6%
22
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
23
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
24
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
25
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
26
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
29
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%