Back

Invasion pathway predicts the axis of ecological niche reorganisation in freshwater crayfish

Miok, K.; Petko, O. N.; Robnik-Sikonja, M.; Parvulescu, L.

2026-04-07 ecology
10.64898/2026.04.05.716527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimUnderstanding whether invasive species retain or shift their ecological niches has traditionally relied on scalar overlap metrics that quantify the magnitude of niche change, but not its structure. Here, we test whether biological invasions involve a reorganisation of the environmental axes along which native and invasive ranges are differentiated, and whether the dominant axes of this reorganisation are consistently associated with invasion pathway type (intercontinental vs. within-continent). LocationGlobal (North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, Australasia). Time periodContemporary (environmental variables representing long-term averages, 1980-2021). Major taxa studiedFreshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea): Procambarus clarkii, Faxonius limosus, Pacifastacus leniusculus, Faxonius virilis, Faxonius rusticus. MethodsWe analysed native and invasive occurrences for five globally important crayfish invaders using [~]400 hydrologically resolved environmental variables from the Global Crayfish Database of Geospatial Traits. Classification models were used to quantify environmental differentiation between native and invasive ranges, and feature contributions were aggregated by environmental domain (climate, topography, soil, land cover). Patterns were evaluated across intercontinental and within-continent invasion pathways and assessed for robustness using cross-validation, permutation tests, sample-size sensitivity, and comparisons with classical niche overlap metrics. ResultsNative and invasive occurrences were consistently distinguishable across all species (accuracy 96.5-99.9%). A pathway-dependent pattern emerged: intercontinental invaders were primarily differentiated along climatic dimensions (58-76% of model importance), whereas within-continent invaders showed a more balanced contribution of climatic and topographic variables ([~]42% each), including strong signals from river network position. This contrast was stable across cross-validation folds (SD < 1.6%), and supported by permutation tests (P = 0.001). Classical niche overlap metrics (Schoeners D = 0.30-0.62) did not capture this qualitative distinction. Main conclusionsBiological invasions involve not only changes in niche position but a reorganisation of the environmental axes that distinguish species distributions. Our results suggest that the dominant axes of this reorganisation differ systematically with invasion pathway, reflecting whether species encounter novel climatic regimes or primarily shift within existing climatic space along topographic and network-position gradients. By resolving which environmental dimensions underpin native-invasive differentiation, this approach provides a complementary perspective to scalar overlap metrics and a basis for more mechanistic interpretations of invasion processes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
10
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
16
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
20
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
26
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
28
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%