Back

Counterfactual Modeling of Directional Cell Cell Influence in Spatial Transcriptomics

Anzum, H.; Kochat, V.; Satpati, S.; Mahmud, M. I.; Dwarampudi, J. M. R.; Rai, K.; Shukla, P.; Javle, M.; Kwong, L.; Banerjee, T.

2026-04-08 cell biology
10.64898/2026.04.05.716510 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how neighboring cells influence cellular states is central to spatial transcriptomics, yet most existing methods rely on correlation or predefined ligand-receptor (LR) pairs and do not explicitly test directionality. We introduce a counterfactual, intervention-based framework for inferring directional cell-cell influence that is LR-agnostic and tests sender specificity. A neighborhood-conditioned graph model predicts receiver cell state from local spatial context. Directional influence is quantified by counterfactually replacing neighbors of a candidate sender type and measuring the resulting displacement in predicted receiver state. We define a Counterfactual Directionality Score (CDS) that quantifies directional influence, and compute pair-level CDS by aggregating across receiver cells and test cores for each ordered sender-receiver pair. Applied to Xenium cholangiocarcinoma tissue microarrays (38 cores), the framework identified reproducible, asymmetric interactions between tumor, immune, and stromal compartments, most prominently Tumor-EMT[-&gt;] Macrophage (CDS = 0.0828) and Fibroblast[-&gt;]Macrophage (CDS = 0.0582). Effects exceeded label-permutation and spatial-shuffle null models (p < 0.001, FDR-controlled) and remained stable under core-level bootstrap resampling. Inferred directional strengths correlated strongly with matched LR scores (r = 0.758, p = 0.0027), supporting biological concordance. These results demonstrate counterfactual testing as a statistically rigorous and scalable approach for directional cell-cell communication analysis in spatial transcriptomics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.2%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
4
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 20%
3.6%
6
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
8
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
10
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.9%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
13
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
15
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
16
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
24
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%