Back

Energetic analysis of Na+/K+-ATPase using bond graphs

Ai, W.; Hunter, P. J.; Pan, M.; Nickerson, D. P.

2026-04-08 biophysics
10.64898/2026.04.05.716446 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The sodium-potassium ATPase (NKA) consumes 19-28% of cellular ATP and is critical for maintaining ion homeostasis. Understanding its energetic efficiency is essential for comprehending cellular physiology and pathophysiology. We develop bond graph models of the NKA that ensure thermodynamic consistency by enforcing conservation of mass, charge, and energy. A simplified 6-state model captures biophysics comparable to a 15-state model while remaining computationally tractable. Through detailed energetic analysis, we demonstrate that under physiological conditions, approximately 65% of the energy from ATP hydrolysis is stored as chemical energy in ion gradients, 10% as electrical energy in the membrane potential, and 25% is dissipated as heat, yielding an overall efficiency of [~]75%. We investigate how the free energy of ATP hydrolysis ({Delta}GATP), intracellular Na+, and extracellular K+ affect NKA efficiency and activity. A critical threshold exists at {Delta}GATP {approx} - 48 kJ/mol below which chemoelectrical transduction drops dramatically, consistent with NKA inhibition under ischemic conditions. The bond graph framework enables quantitative comparison of different NKA models and provides a systematic approach for analyzing ion pumps. SIGNIFICANCEThe sodium-potassium ATPase is one of the bodys most energy-consuming enzymes, yet its energetic efficiency and mechanisms remain incompletely understood. This study presents the first comprehensive energetic analysis using bond graph modeling, guaranteeing thermodynamic consistency. By demonstrating that simplified 6-state models capture essential energetic behaviors of complex 15-state models, we establish bond graphs as a powerful, tractable tool for energetic analysis, model comparison, model selection and validation. The bond graph approach can be applied to other transporters, offering a powerful tool for systems physiology and drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.3%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 1%
19.0%
3
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.3%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
6
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
9
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
10
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
126 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
11
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
12
Journal of General Physiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
14
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
17
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
19
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%