Epidemiologic Moderators of the Effectiveness of Routine Screening for LAIs in High-Biosafety Environments

Justification: Accidental lab-acquired infections (LAIs) with potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs) in high-biosafety research facilities risk causing a pandemic. Routine testing of lab workers for LAIs coupled with isolation of infected workers could reduce the risk, but the impact of such an intervention may depend on pathogens' epidemiological characteristics. Objective: This study aims to understand how the epidemiological characteristics of PPPs moderate the efficacy of a routine testing and isolation intervention in preventing larger outbreaks after an LAI. Methods: We employed a discrete-time stochastic network infectious disease model to run 625,000 epidemic simulations encompassing 625 unique combinations of five parameters of interest: test frequency, pathogen transmissibility, the self-isolation rate for symptomatic cases, the percentage of cases that are asymptomatic, and the percentage of infectious time that is spent in the pre-symptomatic state among those who show symptoms. To summarize the Monte Carlo simulations, we paired visual analysis with logistic regression for formal hypothesis testing, with an emphasis on the interaction terms that capture the moderating effect of epidemiological parameters on the impact of test frequency. Main Results: There were four main findings. First, the relative reductions in risk of outbreak that were caused by increased test frequency were inversely correlated with pathogen transmissibility. Second, the effect of test frequency was magnified at higher asymptomatic shares when the symptomatic self-isolation rate was high, but minimally when the self-isolation rate is low. Third, the direction of how the symptomatic self-isolation rate moderated the effect of increased test frequency depended on the asymptomatic share. Fourth, as the pre-symptomatic share of infectious time increased, the effect of test frequency on the probability of an outbreak was strongly magnified largely independent of symptomatic self-isolation rates. Conclusions: Routine testing and isolation could significantly mitigate the risk of catastrophic PPP escapes, with the intervention's success varying based on pathogen characteristics. High shares of asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission notably increased the relative risk reductions achieved by the intervention. These findings suggest prioritizing testing interventions for pathogens with high asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic transmission and highlight the symptomatic self-isolation rate as a policy intervention target.