Back

Genetic liability to endometriosis and pregnancy outcomes: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study with maternal-fetal effect decomposition

Vibert, J.; Cheng, T. S.; Magnus, M. C.; Aiton, L.; Kutalik, Z.; Baud, D.; Lawlor, D. A.; Borges, M. C.; Pluchino, N.

2026-04-06 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.04.05.26350188 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Endometriosis is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in standard observational studies, including placental complications, preterm birth, and caesarean delivery. However, causal inference from these studies is complicated by residual confounding, differential clinical management, and the presence of intermediate factors such as subfertility and the use of assisted reproductive technologies, which may lie on the causal pathway between endometriosis and adverse outcomes. We applied Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate the causal effects of genetic liability to endometriosis on a broad range of maternal and perinatal outcomes. Methods We conducted a two-sample MR study using summary-level GWAS data. Forty-one independent genetic instruments for endometriosis were derived from the largest available GWAS meta-analysis (60,674 cases; 701,926 controls; mean F-statistic = 279). SNP-outcome associations were obtained for 30 outcomes from the MR-PREG collaboration, FinnGen Release 12, and a postpartum haemorrhage GWAS meta-analysis, spanning placental disorders, pregnancy timing, labour and delivery, hypertensive disorders, fetal growth, and neonatal outcomes. Primary analyses used the inverse-variance weighted method, complemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-PRESSO. Trio-based models disentangled maternal from fetal genetic contributions. Multiple testing was addressed using false discovery rate correction. Findings Across 30 outcomes, only placenta praevia reached FDR-corrected significance, with a robust and consistent causal signal across four of five sensitivity methods (IVW OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.33-1.97; q<0.001). Within the placental disorders domain, estimates for premature placental separation and the broader placental disorders phenotype were directionally concordant but imprecise. For premature rupture of membranes, estimates were concordant across three methods, though the association was sensitive to cohort exclusion and did not survive multiple testing correction and should be interpreted cautiously. By contrast, hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, postpartum haemorrhage, stillbirth, and most neonatal outcomes showed estimates consistently close to the null across all methods. Trio-based analyses suggested predominantly maternal genetic pathways for most outcomes; fetal genetic contributions were not significant after correction for multiple testing, with exploratory signals observed for birthweight-related outcomes requiring independent replication. Interpretation A robust causal signal for placenta praevia alongside directionally consistent estimates across the placental disorders domain, suggests that mechanisms related to abnormal implantation and placentation may constitute a major mechanism for how endometriosis liability influences pregnancy. These results suggest that previously reported associations with broader obstetric outcomes may partly reflect confounding or clinical management patterns, and support targeted surveillance for abnormal placentation rather than a generalised elevation of obstetric risk.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.1%
8
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
18
Biology of Reproduction
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%