Back

PINN-ing the Balloon: A Physically Informed Neural Network Modelling the Nonlinear Haemodynamic Response Function in MRI

Avaria-Saldias, R. H.; Ortiz, D.; Palma-Espinosa, J.; Cancino, A.; Cox, P.; Salas, R.; Chabert, S.

2026-04-07 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.04.04.716499 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate characterisation of the haemodynamic response function (HRF) is central to interpreting blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals in functional magnetic resonance imaging, yet standard estimation approaches remain centred around phenomenological formulations lacking biophysical grounding. We present a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework that bridges these paradigms by embedding the Balloon-Windkessel model directly into the training objective of a multi-headed Neural Network. Our aproach simultaneously estimates probable latent neurovascular state variables such as cerebral blood inflow, metabolic rate of oxygen consumption, blood volume, and deoxyhaemoglobin content, through an indirect optimisation scheme in which the predicted BOLD signal is obtained via convolution of the estimated HRF with experimental stimuli. Training is governed by a composite loss, balancing differential-equation residuals, physiological initial conditions and data fidelity. In simulations with temporal signal-to-noise ratios representative of clinical acquisitions, the framework recovered ground-truth state variables with coefficients of determination exceeding 0.99 and mean squared errors below 10-3, at a physics-to-data weighting of 0.40:0.60. Application to 1.5 T block-design fMRI data from an ischaemic stroke patient yielded physiologically plausible, subject-specific HRF estimates, establishing feasibility of single-subject, physics-constrained HRF inference without reliance on fixed gamma basis assumptions.To our knowledge, this constitutes the first deployment of a single PINN incorporating the full Balloon-Windkessel model within an indirect training objective, reconstructing full BOLD observations, positioning PINN-based haemodynamic modelling as a principled and personalised route towards more interpretable and patient-specific fMRI biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.2%
2
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.3%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
6
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
8
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 28%
2.0%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.7%
14
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
15
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
21
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%